Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-27-2014, 01:25 PM   #1
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,170
Thanks: 7,158
Thanked 10,701 Times in 5,607 Posts

Default

OK, here is the verdict on the Davenport bores and also my method of measuring eight gauge bores when we don't have a bore micrometer big enought to measure the eight, or even a ten. I first marked off the 16" and the 8" depth mark on my $90 Manson wall thickness gauge. I then measured the wall thickness of the Davenport barrel at those depths, from the muzzle. I then flipped the gun over to see if the wall thickness is the same on the other side. I then measured the outside diameter of the barrel with a vernier caliper. The same measurement could be taken with a 1" to 2" micrometer. The wall thicknesses at 16" and 8" are .160" and .145". The outside diameter at the 16" and the 8" marks are 1.180" and 1.140". The bore diameters, calculated by doubling the wall thickness and subtracting it from the outside diameter, are .860 and .850. Allowing for errors in measurement at any of the many points measured, done on a bench with no vise for the gun, I would place the bore diameter at an estimated .855. A more careful measurement of the muzzle at .800, rather than the previously posted .790, would place the choke measurement at .055, a nice full choke for an eight gauge. Test fire to come when the snow melts off the pattern board area.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 11-28-2014, 10:15 AM   #2
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,954
Thanks: 1,803
Thanked 8,663 Times in 3,367 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
Test fire to come when the snow melts off the pattern board area.

i would think the first shot from an 8 gauge would take care of the snow on the pattern board

as for your math- agreed- as long as you have two of the variables - you had wall thickness and outside radius, you can get the third.

Before I acquired my gauges I bought a gun I wanted the wall thickness of. I borrowed a bore gauge, measured the outside and did the math. Later when I assembled my set of gauges I repeated the exercise and then measured the walls- the numbers agreed. just don't tell the late Mrs Peterson I actually used the math she taught me in school - the shock would kill her again.
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 11-28-2014, 10:26 AM   #3
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,141
Thanks: 1,965
Thanked 5,634 Times in 1,571 Posts

Default

It sounds like an interesting gun....... but
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ttiwwp.jpg (22.1 KB, 171 views)
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.