Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register: Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
Probably the most critical point of wall thickness is where the chamber ends and the forcing cone begins. For instance if a gun was ordered to be 'light as can' or 'light as possible' it would have been built on the smallest frame for the gauge (16 on the 0-frame, 12 on the 1-frame, 10 on the 2-frame) and the barrel filer would have brought the barrels to the minimum. Now, if someone today considers lengthening the chambers.... he better think again.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Threaded Mode