 |
|
 |
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
 |
|
 |
07-31-2014, 03:19 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
PGCA Invincible Life Member
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,542
Thanks: 40,227
Thanked 37,102 Times in 13,519 Posts
|
|
In the realm of Parkers we 'never say never'. I had a Trojan 16 with 26" barrels choked Mod/Full with about 3 3/4" of choke in the right barrel and almost 4 1/4" of choke in the left barrel. Both chokes had between 1/4" and 3/8" of parallel walls at the muzzle. It was all original except that it had been very nicely refinished sometime in the more recent past. It was made in 1923 and the serial number is 202066. You can read about it in "Parkers Found" in Parker Pages. More recently the blurb about this Trojan has been condensed but if you grab an issue from 2009 or 2010 you can read the full text about this gun. It is on the 1-frame but is lighter than some of my 0-frame sixteens.
Incidentally, my brother-in-law now owns the gun and he lives about eight miles from me so I can measure the exact choke constriction if it is important to anyone.
Best, Dean
|
|
|
|
07-31-2014, 03:31 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,170
Thanks: 4,827
Thanked 3,129 Times in 1,014 Posts
|
|
Dean,
Certainly Parker changed it's mind on whether they would vary from their firm position on what could be had in a Trojan. I was just making the point to Harold that this gun has two strikes against it being a Trojan based on the phone conversation; but if it is, as you say it is a rare bird indeed, especially in 1917. Or someone knew someone at Parker or one of the employees had it built that way. The jury is still out on what it really is though.
|
|
|
|