Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2013, 09:27 PM   #71
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,939
Thanks: 1,785
Thanked 8,558 Times in 3,350 Posts

Default

may we also add that the proof was done in original condition and many if not most damascus and even early steel barrels have been "cleaned up"

so what they were proofed for and what they are now safe with are likely two different things. one of my letters states it went back to have barrel work including opening the chokes and back again years later to be "cleaned out", comparing the condition of the outside to the shiny insides when I found it I have no doubt it was done a third time.

all this left a minimum of 30 thousands in the front half. comfortable by most folks standards.

people new to damascus have concerns, they should be taken seriously, then educated
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Old 09-04-2013, 08:05 PM   #72
Member
David Hamilton
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 289
Thanks: 290
Thanked 75 Times in 56 Posts

Default

Dean, I do apologize for my facetious remark. No offense was meant. I was only trying to say the same thing you said: This post is exhausted. Sorry, David
David Hamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2013, 09:17 PM   #73
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,029
Thanks: 38,872
Thanked 36,054 Times in 13,213 Posts

Default

Hey David - No apology is necessary.

I completely understood your comment and find no fault with it at all.

I hope I didn't come across as a grouch. If I did I apologize for that.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2014, 10:23 AM   #74
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Gentlemen and others,

I am reviving this thread about Minimum Barrel Wall Thickness because that question was asked elsewhere. If you are wondering about minimum barrel wall thickness please read this entire thread for a quick but solid education on the subject!

Mark
__________________
Don't hunt with a gun that will embarrass your dog!

USMC Retired
USMC Distinguished Marksman
USMC Distinguished Pistol Shot
NRA Benefactor - Ring of Freedom member
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post:
Old 07-13-2014, 10:51 AM   #75
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,274
Thanks: 372
Thanked 4,278 Times in 1,389 Posts

Default

We do have more information now that the tensile strength of both pattern welded and fluid steel has been reported. Short version is here
http://www.lcsmith.org/faq/thickness.html
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Old 07-13-2014, 10:54 AM   #76
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Thanks Drew,

We need to incorporate that into facts page of this PGCA site, with your permission of course!

Respectfully,
Mark
__________________
Don't hunt with a gun that will embarrass your dog!

USMC Retired
USMC Distinguished Marksman
USMC Distinguished Pistol Shot
NRA Benefactor - Ring of Freedom member
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2014, 11:01 AM   #77
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,274
Thanks: 372
Thanked 4,278 Times in 1,389 Posts

Default

Of course

I don't want to give everything away before the article, but this is relevant:

Winchester Nickel Steel from Bethlehem Steel Co. Jan. 1900
http://books.google.com/books?id=Yzh...J&pg=PA181&lpg
Tensile Strength 106,900 psi

Courtesy of Walt Snyder, A.P. Curtis, General Manager of the Ithaca Gun Co. requested composition analysis and tensile strength testing on a section “cut from a barrel made in Belgium” performed by E.J. Stormer, Racine, Wisconsin in 1919. Tensile strength was “about 70,000 psi”.
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Old 07-14-2014, 06:59 PM   #78
Member
Matt Valinsky
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 286
Thanks: 444
Thanked 243 Times in 70 Posts

Default

This should be a "Sticky" Please
Matt Valinsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 09:37 PM   #79
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,699 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

What is the numerical correlation between barrel tensile strength and barrel rupture psi ? I thought the relevant measurement was psi at rupture as an indicator of ultimate strength
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2023, 04:12 PM   #80
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,582
Thanks: 6,790
Thanked 9,933 Times in 5,274 Posts

Default

Deleted
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.