Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Parker GH 16 Damascus-wall thickness
Unread 03-03-2020, 10:59 PM   #1
Member
Garhart Stephenson
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 118 Times in 14 Posts

Default Parker GH 16 Damascus-wall thickness

I find myself in need of expertise. Today the Parker GH 16 ga. arrived from Griffin and Howe. I assembled my wall thickness gauge and took a lot of readings, over and over. The gauge rods flex, so it takes good technique to get accurate readings, thus the desire to repeat. Wall thickness is up to .006" below the recommended minimums I was able to find. I believe that those figures were for 10-12 ga. guns, but have no separate list for 16 ga. In theory, the smaller the bore, the greater proportion of wall to bore/ surface area is, but how much difference it makes I am unqualified to put into reliable numbers.

Overall the gun is in very good condition, even if the barrels appear trimmed at 27 7/8". Listed as I/C & Mod, but choke measurements show Cyl. & Mod. Top lever is far right of center and condition of the gun indicates minimal use. Bores are .663-.664, shiny with just a hint of frosting. Honed? More likely just polished at some time. Barrels may have been refinished long ago, edges are not rounded off anywhere but there are two vent holes on the bottom rib, one on each side of the forearm lug. That tells me someone was worried about draining chemicals and etchant during a refinish.

The area of concern is along the bottom joining rib. Chamber and forcing cone measurements are pretty uniform around the circumference. It's further down that things get eccentric. Looking at the muzzle end, it appears that the tubes have always been that way since the eccentricity continues between the barrels and not just along the rib. Measurements, minimums:

Chamber/forcing cone jct.: R .095"/ L .087"
End of forcing cones: R .107"/ .106"
9" from breech: R .039"/ L .042"
12" from breech: R .026"/ L .033"
9" from muzzle" R .019"/ L .023"

As I take measurements further around the circumference from the bottom rib, thickness increases noticeably, by .010" or greater. I'm curious what Drew (sent you an e-mail) and others with more experience evaluating situations like this think. Useable or lost cause? My intent is hunting with mild loads.
http://
http://
http://

Last edited by Garhart Stephenson; 03-03-2020 at 11:07 PM.. Reason: Photos
Garhart Stephenson is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.