![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#23 | ||||||
|
Bear in mind it was thirty or more years ago but my 410 average was right at 97 but the other three stayed a bit above 98 . By no means all that great but I was happy with . And of the three over 98% the 28 was usually .1-.2% above the 12 and 20 . I think when it was all said and done I had as many if not more hundred straights with the 28 than I did the 20 . As to the 12 gauge most of the 100’s I scored in that gauge were shot with a 20 only 12 100 straights I shot with a 12 were done with an 1100 or 11/87 .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines ! |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#24 | ||||||
|
If you look at NSSA averages for a AAA shooter the 12-20-28 are all .25% apart, the .410 is 2% lower (this is for classification not the scores). I take that to mean that over a long time with shooters of similar ability the .410 is 2% less effective but still shooting 96.5%. For the average bird hunter/recreational shooter I'm not sure that translates at all.
__________________
Before we work on artificial intelligence why don't we work on natural stupidity |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#25 | ||||||
|
I'd love to have a VH Parker in both .410 and 28. BUT, no way I'm dumping that kind of scratch into a shotgun. If I have that kind of disposable cash it'll buy something that with one pull of the trigger can do a mag dump. To each his own.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post: |
|
|
#26 | ||||||
|
One of the reasons for slow sales of the .410-bore Parker during the early years was the available ammunition. From the introduction of the .410-bore shell in North America circa 1914 it was offered in two loadings, 3/10-ounce in a 2-inch shell and 3/8-ounce in a 2 1/2-inch shell. Things picked up for the .410-bore in 1933, at the depth of The Great Depression, with the introduction of the 3-inch shell doubling the max load to 3/4-ounce, along with the Winchester Model 42. A few years later the 2 1/2-inch shell got upped to the 1/2-ounce load we all know.
Similarly, the 28-guage loads were 5/8-ounce for many years. Finally, in 1931 the ammo companies got around to introducing a progressive burning smokeless powder, high velocity load to the 28-gauge with 3/4-ounce of shot. Chas. Askins mentions in his 1910 book of loading 2 1/8 drams of bulk smokeless and 3/4-ounce of shot in the 2 7/8-inch 28-gauge shell for his heavy 30-inch barrel Parker Bros. but the ammo companies didn't offer anything heavier than 2 drams pushing 5/8-ounce. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
|
|
#27 | ||||||
|
Turns out what goes around comes around. The old 5/8oz load is a dandy if you handload.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
|
|
#28 | ||||||
|
After today's G&D auction, I think it is safe to say that prices for Parker 28s and 410s are still strong. The 410s blew past high estimates.
-Victor |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Victor Wasylyna For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|