Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-14-2023, 12:32 PM   #41
Member
Dean Weber
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dean Weber's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 576
Thanks: 383
Thanked 1,876 Times in 294 Posts

Default

Richard,

Even though these discussions are a repeat of others over the years, I find them fascinating. To Researcher's point, even documentation/advice on hang tags is very confusing. In my estimation, chamber length, as a safety concern, is overstated.

For example, I just measured a John Dickson 12 ga. with documented/proofed 2.5" chambers. However, my chamber gauge tool measures them a little more than 2 9/16. I also measured a James Woodward 12 ga. which is documented/proofed at 2.5" but I measure them at 2 5/8. These are documented guns from notable gunmakers where both went through proofing houses. Yet, the chambers are definitely not exactly 2.5". Obviously, these were not lengthened to 2 3/4.

Then if you add in the differences in shell length after the shot, we get many different lengths of spent shells, even though they may be marketed as a 2 3/4 length. My point is an AA shell is 2 11/16 long after firing. Should I be concerned about 1 or 2/16's overlap in my expensive Dickson/Woodward guns which were only proofed at 2.5"? The answer is no for me, as I know my barrel condition is good.

My recommendation is to concern yourself with condition of your barrels first and go have fun 2nd. The chamber length in most cases is a distant concern. That does not mean to disregard pressure or velocity in your determination.
__________________
Follow a good dog while carrying a fine shotgun and you will never be uninspired.
Dean Weber is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Weber For Your Post:
Unread 03-14-2023, 02:02 PM   #42
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,977
Thanks: 1,272
Thanked 5,300 Times in 1,503 Posts

Default

I agree Dean.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 03-14-2023, 04:28 PM   #43
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,954
Thanks: 38,666
Thanked 35,890 Times in 13,162 Posts

Default

A few of Morris’s loads are 1150 psi.






.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-14-2023, 04:32 PM   #44
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,954
Thanks: 38,666
Thanked 35,890 Times in 13,162 Posts

Default

In my opinion, wall thickness at the juncture of the chamber and the beginning of the forcing cone is far, far more critical than chamber length differences of a sixteenth or an eighth of an inch.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
I now have her in my hands
Unread 03-14-2023, 10:55 PM   #45
Member
Richard Mason
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 53
Thanks: 57
Thanked 86 Times in 21 Posts

Default I now have her in my hands

2667CC2D-7020-4E30-9752-2526B6267B9A.jpg

67AA87A0-529D-424E-BEBB-C2EAA3A85800.jpg

8E4ED2A8-9AE7-41A1-A702-0F7678AEE9F9.jpg


I tried a few times with the paper trick of sliding it to touch the start of the force cone with no luck for me , I could feel it good enough

It sure looks longer then 2 1/2 inch to me , I’m going to search out someone who has a chamber measuring device

The bores looked really good

and this took my breath away when I unboxed it after work , it’s more then I could of hoped for , the colours in the CCH is so nice , looks like a old patina on it
1910 Parker , 30 inch barrels ,
I can’t wait to shoot it ,
Richard Mason is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Richard Mason For Your Post:
Unread 03-15-2023, 05:59 AM   #46
Member
Harold Pickens
PGCA Member
 
Harold Lee Pickens's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,972
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 9,025 Times in 2,259 Posts

Default

Handsome gun, very nice!
__________________
"How kind it is that most of us will never know when we have fired our last shot"--Nash Buckingham
Harold Lee Pickens is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Harold Lee Pickens For Your Post:
Unread 03-15-2023, 07:01 AM   #47
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 4,060
Thanked 7,171 Times in 1,390 Posts

Default

I've seen a letter reference from a principal at Parker to Capt. Charles Askins and dated in the 20's that states unequivocally that Parker chambered 12ga guns to 2-5/8" and intended for 2-3/4" shells at factory pressure level. I'll look for it later and will post the content if I can find it.
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post:
Unread 03-15-2023, 08:15 AM   #48
Member
Richard Mason
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 53
Thanks: 57
Thanked 86 Times in 21 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Srebro View Post
I've seen a letter reference from a principal at Parker to Capt. Charles Askins and dated in the 20's that states unequivocally that Parker chambered 12ga guns to 2-5/8" and intended for 2-3/4" shells at factory pressure level. I'll look for it later and will post the content if I can find it.
Please do find it , that will put my mind at ease ,
Thanks
Richard Mason is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-15-2023, 09:03 AM   #49
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,476
Thanks: 503
Thanked 3,939 Times in 1,672 Posts

Default

Richard - Poor man's answer. If you have a small machinist's rule, turn it on its edge and slide it into the chamber until it begins to reach the chamber neck, and light will show between the rule and the chamber wall. Read the rule. Bingo
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post:
Unread 03-15-2023, 06:13 PM   #50
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 4,060
Thanked 7,171 Times in 1,390 Posts

Default

Excerpt from the reply letter from Parker Brothers to Capt Charles Askins:

“Replying to your letter of December 17th [1920] …... Referring to the cone, we ordinarily permit our shells to lap into it 1/8-inch but as a matter of fact we have found that the majority of guns will shoot a better pattern with even more lap than this. …… In user’s hands we do not advocate the use of longer shells than those which give 1/8 lap.

Parker Brothers, per W. A. King”
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.