 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
Hi Unregistered,
On July 29th, this site will be moving..! No, really - it's "moving" to another physical location - including servers, gateways, routers - everything - including my coffee cup...
So, from the date of July 29th through July 30 or 31 (shooting for these dates, but - as always, I'm at the mercy of my ISP who has to install the lines to the new location - and we actually get them running ;) ). But - this site, cloud servers and main web will be OFF LINE.
Now, please save these dates!! Please - don't be "that guy" who emails me on the 30th to tell me you "can't open the Parker Website". I'll already know it is offline - and also know that you are "that guy"...
I'll take this notice up and down over the next week or so - and leave it up during the final few days before shutting it off on the 29th..
John D.
|
 |
 |
.729 the magic number |
 |
06-22-2018, 07:12 AM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 653
Thanks: 339
Thanked 658 Times in 186 Posts
|
|
.729 the magic number
Now I know not all Parkers measure this number, is there a time frame when barrels would deviate from this standard? What range of numbers would you consider acceptable for Parker variation in bore diameters? Would there be any indicators that would suggest the barrels had been honed if the diameters were larger than the standard?
Thanks guys!
|
|
|
|
06-22-2018, 07:43 AM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,378
Thanks: 560
Thanked 20,861 Times in 5,219 Posts
|
|
It went up and down over the years. The late 1880s had some of the larger bore diameters that i have seen. As high as .755+.
I woild say that things did not settle down into what we consider normal siameters today until the 1920s.
Wall thickness and the overall appearance of the bores are indications of any issues.
__________________
B. Dudley
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
|
|
|