Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Parker VH 242242
Unread 02-23-2015, 11:51 AM   #1
Member
Sieg
Forum Associate
 
Scott Siegmund's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 21
Thanks: 22
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts

Default Parker VH 242242

I originally posted some information on this gun in the New Members section and in another members thread, there has been some recent discussion so I felt it would be best to start it's own thread.

I have a Parker VH 12 ga that's been in the family since the early '70's. The Parker was a Christmas gift to my father who passed away in 2001. I've been the caretaker of the gun for about 30 years.

Overall the gun appears to be in decent condition. The wood is original though the rear 'wings' of the beavertail have a fracture line on one side and a repaired fracture line and shaped filler on the other side. Based on the beavertail design I'm guessing that is a somewhat common issue?

A previous owner installed a custom adjustable pad though I'm not certain if the length of pull was altered, LOP from trigger face to the end the stock, not the pad is 13-1/8".

The right barrel ejector appears to have an issue as the 'strikers' in forearm do not align evenly when cocked.

Here's a few pictures:

























Scott Siegmund is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2015, 12:04 PM   #2
Member
Sieg
Forum Associate
 
Scott Siegmund's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 21
Thanks: 22
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts

Default































This forum appears to have a lot of very knowledgeable Parker enthusiast and I would really like to learn more about this gun that's quite special to myself and appears to be a decent example of an unrestored Remington era gun.

Looking forward to your input and discussion.
Scott Siegmund is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scott Siegmund For Your Post:
Unread 02-23-2015, 01:41 PM   #3
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,955
Thanks: 38,668
Thanked 35,894 Times in 13,164 Posts

Default

Scott, that LOP of 13 1/8" with a SST is just about right for an uncut stock. If it were a double trigger gun you could add just about an inch (or 7/8") making a LOP of about 14" which is a pretty standard LOP.

If you don't want the adjustable "pad" that's on there now it would probably be pretty easy to have the correct "Parker Ilion NY" dog's head butt plate installed - or if you plan to shoot trap with it you can have a 'period correct' recoil pad installed.. There are folks who can just about make those cracks in the BTFE disappear
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 02-23-2015, 01:52 PM   #4
Member
George M. Purtill Member #28
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
George M. Purtill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,345
Thanks: 2,040
Thanked 2,346 Times in 866 Posts

Default

Although Dean is the smartest guy I don't know, there is no such thing as a "Parker Ilion NY" dogs head butt plate but there is a period correct DHBP that only says Parker over the circle of the Dog's head. [God I hope I am wrong as I would give my right arm for such a cool thing.] Dean is correct that a period correct plate would be an easy fix.
Where are you? There are lots of skilled members on our forum.
Thanks for all the good pictures.
George M. Purtill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to George M. Purtill For Your Post:
Unread 02-23-2015, 02:01 PM   #5
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,955
Thanks: 38,668
Thanked 35,894 Times in 13,164 Posts

Default



I was thinking of the grip cap... my face is red.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2015, 02:20 PM   #6
Member
Mike Franzen
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Franzen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,964
Thanks: 1,348
Thanked 4,620 Times in 1,388 Posts

Default

xxx
Mike Franzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage!
Unread 02-23-2015, 03:12 PM   #7
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,072
Thanks: 531
Thanked 19,764 Times in 4,983 Posts

Default

Here are some observations I notice on your gun. The LOP from the trigger to the wood on your stock sounds short, but you have a rear position single trigger. So... The LOP of the wood is about normal for a gun that would have a standard double trigger setup. So, depending on how the gun feels to you when shooting it, you may want to put a recoil pad back into it in order to get a good feel of LOP with the single trigger. More of a period correct pad would be just the ticket.

Another thing I notice is that your gun does not have the 1pc. Forend loop which would be standard fare to be used with a Beavertail forend. But... Your forend iron is correct for a Beavertail with the drawbolt.

I wonder if your gun was originally a splinter forend gun with double triggers and it was returned to the factory for the SST and BTFE. Some might argue that Remington would install the 1pc forend loop on the barrels of converting to a BTFE, but I personally doubt it.
There is also a slight stamping font difference between the Serial number on the water table and the number on the forend. But this is just a Suggestion that it could have been a repair addition. Not a tell tale sign.

There are some odd looking Stampings on the barrel flats of your gun, but they do not look like typical repair codes to me. And I doubt a gun as late as yours would have records saying if the SST and BTFE is original or not. Who knows at this time.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 02-23-2015, 03:15 PM   #8
Member
Sieg
Forum Associate
 
Scott Siegmund's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 21
Thanks: 22
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
Scott, that LOP of 13 1/8" with a SST is just about right for an uncut stock. If it were a double trigger gun you could add just about an inch (or 7/8") making a LOP of about 14" which is a pretty standard LOP.

If you don't want the adjustable "pad" that's on there now it would probably be pretty easy to have the correct "Parker Ilion NY" dog's head butt plate installed - or if you plan to shoot trap with it you can have a 'period correct' recoil pad installed.. There are folks who can just about make those cracks in the BTFE disappear
Thanks Dean, the LOP/cut stock issue has been haunting me for years. Having a correct butt plate sitting in the safe would be nice. Regarding the existing pad, I like it from a functional standpoint. LOP and sight picture is very good as it is.

I figured someone could improve on the BTFE repair, the resin used could have been mixed better. With linoleum flooring we would sand a piece of the material and mix the dust with white glue for seam/crack putty. One could make 'issues' virtually undetectable with that technique. I'd imagine wood repair is similar.

Quote:
Originally Posted by George M. Purtill View Post
Although Dean is the smartest guy I don't know, there is no such thing as a "Parker Ilion NY" dogs head butt plate but there is a period correct DHBP that only says Parker over the circle of the Dog's head. [God I hope I am wrong as I would give my right arm for such a cool thing.] Dean is correct that a period correct plate would be an easy fix.
Where are you? There are lots of skilled members on our forum.
Thanks for all the good pictures.
Dean's been a great source of information as have other members here!

I reside in Lane County, OR.

You're welcome for the pics, it's another of too many hobbies.

If there's more specific pics you'd like just hollar.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post


I was thinking of the grip cap... my face is red.
I hate it when that happens! LOL

Last edited by Scott Siegmund; 02-23-2015 at 03:56 PM.. Reason: deleted quote that was removed by the OP
Scott Siegmund is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2015, 03:43 PM   #9
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,887
Thanks: 1,847
Thanked 8,837 Times in 2,594 Posts

Default

Quote:
Another thing I notice is that your gun does not have the 1pc. Forend loop which would be standard fare to be used with a Beavertail forend.
Look again. Yes it does!!

Great example of a late Remington gun with some options.
Dave Noreen is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 02-23-2015, 03:50 PM   #10
Member
Sieg
Forum Associate
 
Scott Siegmund's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 21
Thanks: 22
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
Here are some observations I notice on your gun. The LOP from the trigger to the wood on your stock sounds short, but you have a rear position single trigger. So... The LOP of the wood is about normal for a gun that would have a standard double trigger setup. So, depending on how the gun feels to you when shooting it, you may want to put a recoil pad back into it in order to get a good feel of LOP with the single trigger. More of a period correct pad would be just the ticket.

Another thing I notice is that your gun does not have the 1pc. Forend loop which would be standard fare to be used with a Beavertail forend. But... Your forend iron is correct for a Beavertail with the drawbolt.

I wonder if your gun was originally a splinter forend gun with double triggers and it was returned to the factory for the SST and BTFE. Some might argue that Remington would install the 1pc forend loop on the barrels of converting to a BTFE, but I personally doubt it.
There is also a slight stamping font difference between the Serial number on the water table and the number on the forend. But this is just a Suggestion that it could have been a repair addition. Not a tell tale sign.

There are some odd looking Stampings on the barrel flats of your gun, but they do not look like typical repair codes to me. And I doubt a gun as late as yours would have records saying if the SST and BTFE is original or not. Who knows at this time.
Brian,

Thanks for the insight, all those details are what make this a very interesting puzzle to piece together.

What I do know is the individual that acquired the gun for my father was an avid competitive trap shooter and a good one at that. So the gun may well have come from the trap shooting scene which to me means it could well have been sent back for upgrades.

I just reached out to Roy Marcot who is a friend of a friend that I met on hunting trip back in 2006 when he was co-authoring the book Remington .22 Rimfire Rifles with my friend. Roy is an avid historian and current President of the Remington Society so maybe he can add a few pieces to the puzzle.
Scott Siegmund is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.