![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
You never know till you try. It could work well, it could work well with some work, or of could not work at all.
Apart from proximity of manufacturing dates, the drop of the stocks as compared to one another is the other major variable.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Assuming they are the same frame size, fit without some work will also depend which is older, stock or gun. The hammer projection is further back on older guns, but I'm not sure when the change was made. A 216,xxx stock would need to have some wood relieved from the head, to fit a 100,xxx gun, but not vice versa.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|