![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
A lot of these early guns have a sort of letter prefix with the serial number. Most commonly a "B". And yes, there is no clear consensus as to what it means. And I do not think anyone knows for sure what the "F9R" marking is either. This is also a very common marking on guns within the first several thousand serial numbers.
If your gun is fitted with Damascus barrels, it is likely a front action gun. Since usually back actions were decarbonated steel. Your gun would have the early features such as the lifter pin in top of frame (unless returned to factory for converting), the keyed forend, wedge forend tip, and the flush finished hinge pin. And, likely your gun does not have rebounding locks. Value is depending on condition, and we cannot determine without good photos. With a barrel length like 27", they could be likely cut. But, odd and fractional barrel lengths are more commonly found on earlier guns.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Here is a link to an album on photobucket: http://s67.photobucket.com/user/gold...?sort=3&page=1
If you would like more pictures let me know! |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Based on the photos the following observations can be made. The barrels look like they have been clipped. Either down from 28" or 30". Exterior finish condition looks average for most of these early guns that one will find. Wood looks pretty solid with just minor issues like chipped edges in some spots. It is equivelent to a grade 2 gun.
The Right hammer is not a Parker hammer. The right hammer is a Parker hammer, but does not appear to be original to the gun, being that it is a hammer from a little bit of a later lifter. And there is no engraving on it to match the rest of the gun.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
thanks for your time and expertise!! what would you consider a fair resale price of this old parker? wish it could talk, so I could enjoy it`s history! Thanks again!! Nate |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Based on the little that I see and the issues with the gun, I would say no more than $500. Could go up from there with other unknowns like bore condition and lockup. If both are Very good, that is a plus.
That is just my opinion.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
$500- wow | ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
I am pleased to be here! Last edited by Grantham Forester; 03-19-2014 at 08:08 PM.. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|