Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-29-2021, 05:37 PM   #21
Member
Craig Budgeon
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 508
Thanks: 144
Thanked 388 Times in 225 Posts

Default

Bill many people would look at the cold blued Titanic and accept it as factory back in the day. I suppose Bernard steel would have been more believable. The nitro proofs raise a red flag and how about that serial which exceeds Parker production by more than 30,000. Peter Johnson may not have been the most knowledgeable Parker collector but he cultivated a great deal of interest in Parkers and American doubles in general for having taken the time to write the book.
Craig Budgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Craig Budgeon For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 09:44 AM   #22
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,994
Thanks: 1,277
Thanked 5,396 Times in 1,516 Posts

Default

Richard, the GHE is more likely 3 iron crolle. If you can see the dividing line that splits a crolle, follow it to the next dividing line. Count the full crolles and 2 split crolles and you have your total. The dividing lines are sometimes hard to see but the lower DH is easily seen.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 11:57 AM   #23
Member
Keith Doty
PGCA Member
 
Keith Doty's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 641
Thanks: 732
Thanked 837 Times in 339 Posts

Default

The altered serial number intrigues me. WHY? Isn't that a big issue with ATF?
Keith Doty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 02:24 PM   #24
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,664
Thanks: 6,851
Thanked 10,039 Times in 5,319 Posts

Default

Pre 1899 serial number, ATF does not consider this a gun. You can stamp what you want on it.
Bill Murphy is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 04:44 PM   #25
Member
Brian H
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Hornacek's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 885
Thanks: 2,170
Thanked 4,792 Times in 526 Posts

Default

Is this the gun that someone stamped nitro proof on the barrel flat?
Brian Hornacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 05:34 PM   #26
Member
Jim DiSpagno
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2,765 Times in 816 Posts

Default

Yes Brian.
Jim DiSpagno is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 06:07 PM   #27
Member
Craig Budgeon
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 508
Thanks: 144
Thanked 388 Times in 225 Posts

Default

The gun is unique though as it is the only double gun I can remember that only has 1 barrel nitro proofed.
Craig Budgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Craig Budgeon For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 11:08 PM   #28
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,129
Thanks: 4,640
Thanked 3,051 Times in 985 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
One would not need to read Johnson's book to recognize that rendering of "Titanic" as an alteration of the factory marking. There was a great wealth of Parker knowledge in the years before Johnson's book was published.
So how does someone restamp TITANIC over DAMASCUS that has been removed, yet one can still see the Damascus pattern in the rib below the roll stamp with no evidence of filing/grinding and welding up? Isn't it just possible that it was a rare mistake?
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 11:36 PM   #29
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,402
Thanks: 3,881
Thanked 6,588 Times in 1,581 Posts

Default

Jerry you have a point there. Although with all of the other unusual markings I tend to agree something not so straight up took place on this gun.
SN is 27404 which was made in 1882. When did Titanic steel barrels come out?
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-31-2021, 05:40 AM   #30
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,125
Thanks: 39,096
Thanked 36,241 Times in 13,271 Posts

Default

74842

Titanic barrels were first introduced in 1897 I believe.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.