Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-22-2017, 08:14 PM   #11
Member
Quack me up!
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 162
Thanks: 235
Thanked 99 Times in 35 Posts

Default

I guess I should have stated that with this gauge, you zero out the dial using the supplied .700 diameter ring, then when placed in the barrel it read .051, so effectively .751 as a starting point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Losey View Post
29 thousands is a full choke

four inches of taper in a choke is not unheard of

as for charts - pick one

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q...tion&FORM=IGRE

but I am confused - a modern nominal 12 gauge is .729 - older Parkers were often a little over bored

are you saying that 4 inches from the muzzle - the bore diameter is .051?
Bob Dombeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2017, 08:55 PM   #12
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,604
Thanks: 3,332
Thanked 13,144 Times in 3,482 Posts

Default

Bob, it took me a moment or two to understand your table of figures, but now I see what you were saying.you have a difference between the bore of .751, and the muzzle of .722, giving you .029" constriction. It depends on whose chart you read, but it's certainly closing in on full.
My only question is your table doesn't seem linear, and looks like it bells in the last inch or so.
All of my Parker choke reamers are very straight. (but tapered, duh)
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2017, 09:08 PM   #13
Member
Quack me up!
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 162
Thanks: 235
Thanked 99 Times in 35 Posts

Default

That's what I'm concerned with, that much constriction in the last inch or so. Doesn't seem right to me?

Quote:
Originally Posted by edgarspencer View Post
Bob, it took me a moment or two to understand your table of figures, but now I see what you were saying.you have a difference between the bore of .751, and the muzzle of .722, giving you .029" constriction. It depends on whose chart you read, but it's certainly closing in on full.
My only question is your table doesn't seem linear, and looks like it bells in the last inch or so.
All of my Parker choke reamers are very straight. (but tapered, duh)
Bob Dombeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2017, 09:14 PM   #14
Member
todd allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,219
Thanks: 2,179
Thanked 3,469 Times in 1,188 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Lewis View Post
Is this correct or should it be eliminated?
http://www.parkerguns.org/pages/faq/ChokeSize.htm
That chart is on the money. That said, I think every gun should be pattern tested with whatever load you will be using.
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2017, 09:15 PM   #15
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,977
Thanks: 1,272
Thanked 5,300 Times in 1,503 Posts

Default

I wish I could understand all that machinist mumbo jumbo but I don't. I always considered .030 as the start of the full choke range but the patterning board results are what really count.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 01-23-2017, 06:58 AM   #16
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,968
Thanks: 38,692
Thanked 35,907 Times in 13,167 Posts

Default

Edgar, with a straight line (tapered) cutter how did they arrive at the 'ogee' at the beginning and at the end of the length of the choke taper? Was the ogee the result of the final hone and polish?

I recall reading that Parkers produced in Illion did not have the ogee that the Parker Bros. craftsmen finished the chokes with... I wonder why not and if the transition from the cylinder tube directly to the choke cone would affect the pattern by the possibility of more shot pellets being deformed?

I have a 12 bore with .041" and .042" of constriction that is certainly tighter than the .029" constriction suggested as full choke... so, what degree of choke should I call it?





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-23-2017, 07:03 AM   #17
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,935
Thanks: 1,778
Thanked 8,547 Times in 3,347 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
I have a 12 bore with .041" and .042" of constriction that is certainly tighter than the .029" constriction suggested as full choke... so, what degree of choke should I call it?
.
that is where my Elsie Longrange is - I think Super Foxes are typically around that or even just a bit more

i just call it extra full
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 01-23-2017, 07:15 AM   #18
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,968
Thanks: 38,692
Thanked 35,907 Times in 13,167 Posts

Default

Incidentally, this is the gun that Larry Frey used to win the New Year's Day Shoot with. It reaches out there.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-23-2017, 07:39 AM   #19
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,604
Thanks: 3,332
Thanked 13,144 Times in 3,482 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
Edgar, with a straight line (tapered) cutter how did they arrive at the 'ogee' at the beginning and at the end of the length of the choke taper? Was the ogee the result of the final hone and polish?
A straight tapered reamer is not going to yield anything but a straight taper. Any machining operation that yielded a curved surface at either end of the taper was either done by a hand lapping operation, or another tool. Of all the reamers in Hayes' tool box, there are no such reamers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
I recall reading that Parkers produced in Illion did not have the ogee that the Parker Bros. craftsmen finished the chokes with... I wonder why not and if the transition from the cylinder tube directly to the choke cone would affect the pattern by the possibility of more shot pellets being deformed?
I Can't comment on this, because I have never read what you're refering to, nor do I own, or care to own , any Ilion Remington made Parkers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
I have a 12 bore with .041" and .042" of constriction that is certainly tighter than the .029" constriction suggested as full choke... so, what degree of choke should I call it?
Cheerio tight. Not a British choke term, but a Yankee one, describing a gun so tight, you can shoot through a Cheerio and not break it.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 01-23-2017, 08:29 AM   #20
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,476
Thanks: 503
Thanked 3,939 Times in 1,672 Posts

Default

My Fox Sterlingworth is .044" in both barrels. I believe it will shoot 1" groups at 100 yards
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.