![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Don Anderson For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Parker?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Steve Huffman For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Don Anderson For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
That gun has an interesting combination of features. That is far and away the lowest serial number I've seen with the Q inventory code preceding it on the trigger guard tang. From what I've recorded over the years I don't see the Q until the later style action appears in the mid 35xxxx range. The gun also has the late style stock with the stock cheeks and the late style butt plate.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
Nope.... Remington Arms.
Don, I see you are a brand new PGCA member... A friendly suggestion to you. Spend a few bucks and buy a few books on Parker Brothers shotguns. I recommend you get a copy of the late Ed Muderlak's book, "Parker Guns - The Old Reliable". That was my first Parker book and it helped me on the road immeasurably. Best to You my Friend ! Dean .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
Thanks Researcher. I was hoping you would chime in. I read a lot of your posts before I decided to buy this gun.
Can you determine from your records what year it was manufactured? |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
By the serial number chronology, the late Charles Semmer produced for his book Remington Double Shotguns, this gun would be of 1903 vintage. While no production records for the Remington Hammerless Doubles have been found, Charles extrapolated his chronology from surviving shipping records.
The stock cheeks, like the A- to EEO-Grade guns, first appears for a K quality gun in the first 1906 Remington Arms Co. catalog which added the KE-Grade to the line. 1906 Catalog pg 2, K- and KE-Grades.jpg I see the W.H. stamp in that location on so many guns it must be an inspector in the barrel department. The P you mention is actually a joined JP that I believe is the mark of the rough barrel tube supplier. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Thanks Researcher for the great info.
If I understand correctly from some of your previous posts, the "28" and "60" on the barrel lugs equates to 328 and 360 # 8 shot in a 30" circle at 40 yds. I think that would be modified and extra full even though both chokes measure the same with my gauge. I guess the tighter bore may have been opened up some? My homemade bore gauge measures the chambers at 2.67" so I think they are the factory standard 2 5/8" Your comment regarding the butt stock style made me wonder if it was a replacement, so I checked under the trigger guard and found the correct serial number. (339334)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|