![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so. - Mark Twain. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
length wise - i like 18" a little room to spare if I want to completely measure a 32" set of barrels. I like using the digital- but the draw back is - always remember to have a spare battery around. but I also have a dial bore gauge, and it works absolutely fine - so the answer to that is - personal choice - no practical advantage
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
So excuse me for bein' dumb, but...you can measure the choke constriction with this as well, right?
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so. - Mark Twain. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
to use the gauge - you use a ring that comes with it to zero it - the inside of the ring is .700 for the 16 to 10 size. so when you drop the gauge in a 12 ga for example and it reads .029 that means the bore is .729. if it reads -006 at the muzzle - the choke is .035 simple once you have done it a couple times
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
An inside caliper can measure the inside of a bore can work to measure constriction. I have seen them with spring loaded legs that are maybe 4-5" long. You can use them for choke and also chamber length gauging.
That would likely be your best option at an "economy way" and still use accurate equipment. Like these... 8809454-24.jpg Unknown.jpg
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Brian, my only problem with those is that unless you want to pay a pretty good chunk the ones I've looked at say accuracy is around +/- .01. I didn't think that was good enough. Maybe I just wasn't looking at high enough quality ones?
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so. - Mark Twain. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
I prefer mechanical gauges over digitals, and as Rick says, keep (a pack) of batteries handy; they eat them. Mechanical gauges with a telltale make meaningful measurements easier. Digitals have a zero function, but when you zero, your previous measurement is lost. When we were certifying to ISO 9001, digital gauges, on almost every measuring instrument was considered a secondary measuring tool. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Phil, are you sure of your measurement? .01 is one hundredth of an inch. A good machinist with a scale can identify .01. We are talking about cheap micrometers that will measure one thousandth of an inch.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|