Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Two new Parker's
Unread 11-02-2010, 11:35 PM   #1
Member
Expensive Habit
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 18
Thanks: 48
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post

Default Two new Parker's

Brought home 2 new Parker's from an auction last weekend.
A 10 guage lifter and a 12 guage V grade.

Need a little help to identify the 10 gauge lifter. I know that it was made in 1880 Serial number 18470. From what I read on the site here is that after 1875 the guns should have a grade and pre 1875 the guns are given a dollar value.... so this gun should have a grade but I didn't find any examples in the pictures provided that I could match it to.
The stock has been redone at some point, but all serial numbers match.
Here are some pictures:
(the shiny oval on the one side plate is a registration sticker not sure why the powers that be deemed that necessary when the gun has a serial number!)













The other is a redone V grade 12 guage from 1906. Serial number 136705. Serial numbers match except for the trigger guard, so obviously it has been replaced. Would like some opinions on the quality of the refinishing.
Here are a few pictures:











Sorry, I should have had my photographer (hubby) take some closeups of the case colors...

I am so glad this forum is here, you are all so helpful to newbies like me!

Wendy
Wendy Bonertz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wendy Bonertz For Your Post:
Unread 11-03-2010, 02:35 AM   #2
Member
Robert Delk
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 496
Thanks: 1
Thanked 142 Times in 93 Posts

Default

The V grade appears to have been colored by use of a torch,although it is hard to be sure.
Robert Delk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Robert Delk For Your Post:
Unread 11-03-2010, 04:59 AM   #3
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,954
Thanks: 38,666
Thanked 35,890 Times in 13,162 Posts

Default

I agree with Robert.

18470 is a grade 0 gun and was originally made with 32" barrels.

What did you end up paying for them?
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 11-03-2010, 05:34 AM   #4
Member
winplumber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,693
Thanks: 1,899
Thanked 669 Times in 421 Posts

Default

Not sure but looks like the hammers dont match
Steve Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-03-2010, 06:53 AM   #5
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,954
Thanks: 38,666
Thanked 35,890 Times in 13,162 Posts

Default

You're right Steve.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-03-2010, 06:57 AM   #6
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Wendy,

I thanked you for posting photos and serial numbers when asking for an evaluation!

You have two nice Parkers. While they may not be museum quality they are fine examples of Parker Brother's enduring quality. Assuming that both guns are tight on face and have clean bores that have NOT been reamed to thin (obviously the barrel thickness's should be checked) they should great shooters that can be passed to the next generation.

I've taken doubles on ducks and geese this season with DH and EH ten bores. My good old (actually pretty new) Benelli M2 with heavy Shot would have slayed waterfowl easier but hunting with a 120 year gun just seems like a better thing to do!

Best of luck to you with your two new Parkers!!!

Respectfully,
Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post:
Unread 11-03-2010, 07:23 AM   #7
Member
ch
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
calvin humburg's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,816
Thanks: 1,654
Thanked 640 Times in 351 Posts

Default

yes a stright grip hammer gun what more could you want. Well maybe a stright grip d grade with a skeleton buttplate, but one can never be satisfied. ch
__________________
Father, will I be able to be brave when I am afraid? Child, that is the only time one can be brave.
calvin humburg is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to calvin humburg For Your Post:
Unread 11-03-2010, 08:38 AM   #8
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,541
Thanks: 6,764
Thanked 9,888 Times in 5,251 Posts

Default

You should get some good advice on collecting Parkers before you continue. The hammer gun shows serious defects in fit of wood to metal, which indicates amateur disassembly and "fooling around" which brings value down to zero in short order. Poor fit of metal to metal is another indication of bad gunsmithing that brings value to zero quickly. The hammerless gun shows very bad gunsmithing and refinish and such work has brought that gun to zero collector value. Zero collector value translates into zero shooter value because shooters don't buy Parkers just to shoot, they want to be proud of them when they show them off. More and more people these days know about good Parkers and bad guns are recognized by more shooters and casual collectors every day. Be careful.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 11-03-2010, 11:02 AM   #9
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 758 Times in 419 Posts

Default

Bill, I think you're being a bit hard in you're values. I don't buy to collect [ can't afford it ] - I buy to shoot. All your points are what buyers look at - but I wouldn't say zero for value. Good, sound " beaters " are worth from 600 to a 1000. JMHI - Paul
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Paul Harm For Your Post:
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 11-03-2010, 01:23 PM   #10
Member
Expensive Habit
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 18
Thanks: 48
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Harm View Post
Bill, I think you're being a bit hard in you're values. I don't buy to collect [ can't afford it ] - I buy to shoot. All your points are what buyers look at - but I wouldn't say zero for value. Good, sound " beaters " are worth from 600 to a 1000. JMHI - Paul
Thanks Paul, I was beginning to think I didn't belong in this elite group. I can't afford "Good" Parkers..... I knew these were not pristine guns. Just guns I could afford and possibly shoot. I paid less than the amount you quoted for these guns. I wish I could afford to pay $48,000 for a nice Parker .410 but that is not going to happen.
Wendy Bonertz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.