![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
I agree with Robert.
18470 is a grade 0 gun and was originally made with 32" barrels. What did you end up paying for them? |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Not sure but looks like the hammers dont match
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
You're right Steve.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Wendy,
I thanked you for posting photos and serial numbers when asking for an evaluation! You have two nice Parkers. While they may not be museum quality they are fine examples of Parker Brother's enduring quality. Assuming that both guns are tight on face and have clean bores that have NOT been reamed to thin (obviously the barrel thickness's should be checked) they should great shooters that can be passed to the next generation. I've taken doubles on ducks and geese this season with DH and EH ten bores. My good old (actually pretty new) Benelli M2 with heavy Shot would have slayed waterfowl easier but hunting with a 120 year gun just seems like a better thing to do! Best of luck to you with your two new Parkers!!! Respectfully, Mark |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
yes a stright grip hammer gun what more could you want. Well maybe a stright grip d grade with a skeleton buttplate, but one can never be satisfied.
![]()
__________________
Father, will I be able to be brave when I am afraid? Child, that is the only time one can be brave. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to calvin humburg For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
You should get some good advice on collecting Parkers before you continue. The hammer gun shows serious defects in fit of wood to metal, which indicates amateur disassembly and "fooling around" which brings value down to zero in short order. Poor fit of metal to metal is another indication of bad gunsmithing that brings value to zero quickly. The hammerless gun shows very bad gunsmithing and refinish and such work has brought that gun to zero collector value. Zero collector value translates into zero shooter value because shooters don't buy Parkers just to shoot, they want to be proud of them when they show them off. More and more people these days know about good Parkers and bad guns are recognized by more shooters and casual collectors every day. Be careful.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Bill, I think you're being a bit hard in you're values. I don't buy to collect [ can't afford it ] - I buy to shoot. All your points are what buyers look at - but I wouldn't say zero for value. Good, sound " beaters " are worth from 600 to a 1000. JMHI - Paul
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Paul Harm For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|