![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Lawrence we have learned many times to "never say never" but the odds are probably approaching 99% that the Monte is not original. Post the serial number and we may be able to tell you a little more if it's in the book.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Randy G Roberts For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Agree with Mills; looks like a stock splice. Looks well done though!
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so. - Mark Twain. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
What looks like a splice is actually the grain. It is one solid piece of wood. But it is a restock that is not factory. There is nothing about the stock that suggest it may have been done at the factory.
The forend is original.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
I agree with Brian. Clearly a restock rear, original front. looks like it would be a nice shooter!
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to todd allen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Serial number 155009, thanks for the input.
If I put a proper stock on her would that help the value and shooting experience? |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Unfortunately that one is not in the book but there are surviving records available. You should/could join the PGCA and get a research letter on your gun.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Your own personal outlook and desires should be a good starting point as to what to do regarding the stock once you find out more about its origin. I would suggest that if you do get a replacement stock, keep the one the came with the gun...it's part of the history of the gun. To add to the other comments: Consider getting a letter. A research letter can really add to your enjoyment and understanding of the gun, another part of the "shooting experience."
__________________
"Doubtless the good Lord could have made a better game bird than bobwhite, and better country to hunt him in...but equally doubtless, he never did." -- Guy de la Valdene (from A Handful of Feathers ) "'I promise you,' he said, 'on my word of honor, I won't die on the opening of the bird season.'" -- Robert Ruark (from The Old Man and the Boy) |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Garry L Gordon For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
But the letter won't confirm that stock replacement. It wasn't done by Parker Bros. or Remington.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|