![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Probably, if the price were right and for the right customer. Colt made only one 8 gauge (so I understand) and it was for Grover Cleveland. This was an era where companies aimed to serve the customer
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mills Morrison For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
20 gauge hammer guns were made up into the 160,000 SN range, so since there already existed tooling for 0 framed 16 and 20 gauged guns, it wouldn't have required much work to build one in 28 gauge. It may have turned out a little heavy, but certainly no more than an 0 framed hammerless 28 when compared to the typical 0 framed 20.
As there were several American gun makers,and plenty of British and continental makers turning them out, it does make one wonder why Parker never did. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
I am sure they would have if a customer wanted one. But i doubt it would be on anything smaller than an 0 frame since that is the smallest hammer gun frame that was built up till then.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
The serial number on this 20-gauge Lifter is 10165 and the pin separation is 18MM which translates to less than 13/16" which is the 0000-frame size. In fact, it is more than 1/16" smaller - which would make it slightly smaller than a 00000-frame size... if Parker had ever even made such a frame size. The frame sizes were determined by firing pin separation at the breech face and are incremental by sixteenths of an inch. The 0-frame has a pin separation of 1" exactly. The 00-frame has a separation of 15/16" exactly... and so on. My point is that Parker Bros. could have easily made a .410, even in a lifter, if they so desired. That bore size was certainly being made in the British Isles at that time. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
I wonder if one is hiding in the missing records?
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
If the right Connecticut Governor had asked, they would have made it.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Edgar is right. No tooling neccesary for a 28 gauge hammer gun on the 0 frame. If Dr. Truitt had been around, it would have been a 34" gun.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|