Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Help - Wall Thickness at the Muzzle ?
Unread 04-30-2010, 08:39 AM   #1
Member
Dave Miles
Forum Associate
 
Dave Miles's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 242
Thanks: 4
Thanked 72 Times in 32 Posts

Default Help - Wall Thickness at the Muzzle ?

What do you guys feel is safe minimum wall thickness at the muzzle?
I'm thinking .010" or .012" I know the thinner it is, the easier it will dent, but where do you draw the line. Some sound advice is needed please.
Dave Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-30-2010, 10:59 AM   #2
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,544 Times in 1,719 Posts

Default

.010" is only 2x the thickness of a beer can. I have a VH12 that was opened by an unnamed gunsmith who left me with non concentric chokes with only .017" in the thinnest part and these muzzles dent if you hunt in a strong wind; I easily took a small dent out with a large round wooden pencil once. I think .010" is safe but will most certainly get dented regularly without extreme caution at all times. Needless to say, the unnamed gunsmith is off my list.
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-30-2010, 11:36 AM   #3
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,122
Thanks: 39,085
Thanked 36,227 Times in 13,266 Posts

Default

The accepted minimum wall thickness is .025"
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-30-2010, 12:02 PM   #4
Member
Dave Miles
Forum Associate
 
Dave Miles's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 242
Thanks: 4
Thanked 72 Times in 32 Posts

Default

Richard, I'm aware of your situation with the unnamed gunsmith, but didn't know for sure what the dimensions of your walls were.
If .017" isn't worth a tinkers damn, then I guess .010" or .012" won't be either.
.025" it shall be then. Thanks for the advice.

Last edited by Dave Miles; 04-30-2010 at 12:33 PM..
Dave Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-30-2010, 01:40 PM   #5
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,290
Thanks: 379
Thanked 4,328 Times in 1,403 Posts

Default

From the German proof house: minimal wall thickness at end of chamber, regardless of length, for 12, 16 & 20 gauge guns should be 2.3mm (.0906") for 'ordinary good steel' or 2.1mm (.0827") if a 'Special Steel' was used. Minimal wall of .6mm (.0236") was recomended in the "forward third" of the barrel ie. what Dean said.

One of the Greeners progressively reamed the muzzles to the point that he could trim the ends with a penknife and the barrels did not rupture/split with standard loads. I wouldn't be standing next to the gun or shooter during the experiment however.
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 04-30-2010, 03:51 PM   #6
Member
Harry Collins
PGCA Member
 
Harry Collins's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,929
Thanks: 10,140
Thanked 1,804 Times in 744 Posts

Default

I witnessed a thumb lever Purdey with paper thin muzzels unwind from a 2 1/2 Eley with #6 shot.

Harry
Harry Collins is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Harry Collins For Your Post:
Unread 04-30-2010, 06:09 PM   #7
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,659
Thanks: 6,847
Thanked 10,036 Times in 5,317 Posts

Default

Drew, what do the Germans say about the middle third from the "front of the chambers" forward?
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-30-2010, 06:23 PM   #8
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,290
Thanks: 379
Thanked 4,328 Times in 1,403 Posts

Default

That's all I have Bill, but here's what the Brits say

UK Working Standards recomended minimum wall thickness measured 18" from the breech from Double Gun Classics p. 56, Vol. 1, No. 4 Jan-Feb, 2006:
2 1/2" 12g- .028
2 3/4" 12g- .032
Re-proof recomended minimum- .024
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 04-30-2010, 04:42 PM   #9
Member
Bindlestiff
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Robin Lewis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 703
Thanked 2,946 Times in 870 Posts

Default

Wow, maybe I'll shoot my old lifter with what I thought were thin barrels. I'll roll out an old tire and put the old A grade to a proof test. Wish me luck!
Robin Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2010, 11:07 AM   #10
Member
jay shachter
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 79 Times in 7 Posts

Default

Hey Guys,

Regarding barrel wall thickness, I have measured literally thousands of them. If you are using 25 thou as your minimum, you will be retiring most of your 20ga. Parkers and "O" frame 16ga. Parkers, as well as many of your other fine lightweight doubles. Most light weight Parker 16's and 20's range between 20 and 25 thou as their minimum, usually 6-12"
back from the muzzle. I am talking factory original, unmolested, original blue and factory bore diameter barrels. I have measured a half dozen Parker ORIGINAL barrels that got down to 18 thou in the same areas, and they were not honed or reblued.

If you look at the Shooting Sportsman from last fall I believe, they had an article addressing concentricity in barrels. The article was mostly about Holland and Holland and their quest for perfection in barrel making. The first few paragraphs asks the question; how to quantify what constitutes a safe barrel when buying vintage guns? The stated industry standard as mentioned in that article is 20 thou, not 25. It is important to clarify that this measurement should be beyond the mid point of the barrel set.

In all the measuring I have done, there has never been an American made double that had barrels with concentric boring. They all are signifcantly thicker on one side of the barrel than the other. The thinnest point is usually found in about an area that would constitute 1/8 of the total circumference of the barrel and in a 8-10" longitudinal line. The rest of the barrels are substantially over the minimums.

Just an FYI
jay shachter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jay shachter For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.