![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
No "con" in my view, just a different era.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Ed Blake For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Remington Parkers are wonderful guns, many being in high original condition.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Yup...What Bill said. In fact I'm heading out to shoot one right now..
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Suponski For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
My 1936 30" SG #2 frame VH12 is a real beauty and a great duck gun. s/n 239189. Remington really did put much nicer wood on lower grade guns than Parker did.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Richard Flanders For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
I would not have any reservations about owning a Rem.-Parker. I liked what Ed said "just a different era."
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Richard White For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
As I said on a previous post,the Remington gun generally have more modern stock dimensions as well as nicer wood.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to John Allen For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
And given the relative rarity of Remington guns, in both numbers and years manufactured, they are sought after by most collectors.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|