Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Paper, Memorabilia and Books

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Food for thought
Unread 02-26-2015, 02:49 PM   #1
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,023
Thanks: 3,653
Thanked 6,660 Times in 1,300 Posts

Default Food for thought

Many of us have read that 12-gauge guns made for 2-3/4" paper shells were chambered to 2-5/8" for a better gas seal/transition of wads from shell to bore. And of course we're aware of Sherman Bell's testing of 2-3/4" shells in short chambers. OK, check out this 1904 advert. The new 12 ga Marlin is chambered for 2-5/8" and 2-3/4" shells. Great!

So, can we infer that any 12-gauge American guns made for the early 2-5/8" paper shells were chambered to 2-1/2"?

Also, 12-gauge 2-5/8" smokeless shells were made at least into the 40's by Peters and possibly others. And why was that? What guns were they intended for?

Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post:
Unread 02-26-2015, 03:53 PM   #2
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,954
Thanks: 36,472
Thanked 33,967 Times in 12,577 Posts

Default

I'll bet Researcher can shed some light on these questions.

So then, what length shells was my 12 Ga. DH with Titanic barrels chambered at 2 9/16" made for?

"Double, double toil and trouble; Fire burn and caldron bubble."
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-26-2015, 04:44 PM   #3
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,802 Times in 3,968 Posts

Default

dean the fellow who made the chamber length in your gun that day was dreaming of a 16 ga thus the 2 9/16 inch chambers...charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-26-2015, 07:03 PM   #4
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,528
Thanks: 16,378
Thanked 6,789 Times in 2,601 Posts

Default

Correct me if I'm wrong Frank but the way I read that ad is that the Marlin is chambered for 2 3/4 so 2 5/8 can also be shot in it. Neat ad. Thanks.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less.
Daryl Corona is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post:
Unread 02-26-2015, 08:48 PM   #5
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,023
Thanks: 3,653
Thanked 6,660 Times in 1,300 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daryl Corona View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong Frank but the way I read that ad is that the Marlin is chambered for 2 3/4 so 2 5/8 can also be shot in it. Neat ad. Thanks.
Daryl, that's the way I read it too. My questions have to do with American factory 2-5/8" paper shells. If factory practice was to cut 2-5/8" chambers for 2-3/4" shells, then why would the factories be marketing 2-5/8" paper shells? For a 2-1/2" chamber? Were any American 12-gauge guns made with 2-1/2" chambers?
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post:
Unread 02-26-2015, 09:14 PM   #6
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,168
Thanks: 340
Thanked 3,975 Times in 1,302 Posts

Default

No mention of the load length in the 1905 Marlin Model 19 ad



Back again 1913 Model 28 Marlin Repeating Shotgun



Stevens No. 200 20g "for any length of shell" in 1913
http://www.la84foundation.org/Sports.../SL6212020.PDF
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 02-26-2015, 09:19 PM   #7
Member
George M. Purtill Member #28
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
George M. Purtill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,343
Thanks: 2,040
Thanked 2,301 Times in 863 Posts

Default

Drew and Frank (and Dave who will probably chime in)- you guys absolutely kill me with these old ads. Thank you for the good views and information.
George M. Purtill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to George M. Purtill For Your Post:
Unread 02-26-2015, 09:22 PM   #8
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,528
Thanks: 16,378
Thanked 6,789 Times in 2,601 Posts

Default

Good question Frank. Hopefully our info Guru Dave N. will have some input on this shell length issue.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less.
Daryl Corona is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-26-2015, 09:33 PM   #9
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,168
Thanks: 340
Thanked 3,975 Times in 1,302 Posts

Default

1897 Sears listing for hulls lists none in 2 1/2" (tough to read the fine print though)
http://books.google.com/books?id=CSV...C&pg=PA546&lpg

Same with 1895 Montgomery Ward except 2 1/2" brass shells
http://books.google.com/books?id=zWe...AC&pg=PA474&vq
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 02-26-2015, 07:27 PM   #10
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

On the small end they may have limited it to 2 5/8" because it is a pump. It may not cycle well with 2 1/2" shells.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.