|
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
07-22-2010, 10:37 AM
|
#3 | ||||||
|
For the forward 2/3 of the barrels .025" has been suggested as a minimum thickness for safety reasons. The rear 1/3 of the barrels where maximum pressures are exerted requires thicker wall thickness and the wall thickness at the juncture of the chambers and the forcing cone is the most critical as far as wall thickness goes. I'm not certain of this but I think .090" at this location would be about minimum. Others may disagree...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
 |
 |
 |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 10:45 AM
|
#4 | ||||||
|
I pretty much agree with Eric and Dean. But I would feel a bit more comfortable with .030 in the tubes and .100 forward of the chamber.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Suponski For Your Post: |
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 11:03 AM
|
#5 | ||||||
|
This question seems to keep coming up, so I added the following to the FAQ based on Deans comments.
Opinions welcome!!!! Changes, or even deletion, are options. This one scares me a bit. http://parkerguns.org/pages/faq/BarrelThickness.htm |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Robin Lewis For Your Post: |
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 09:08 PM
|
#6 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Robin ... What a great illustration ! ... I hope everyone prints several copies for future reference ... THANKS ! Jim Kucaba ... AriZOOna Cactus Patch ... Email: JimKucaba@aol.com
__________________
"The price of critics NEVER changes ... They're ALWAYS a dime a dozen" "Those who matter don't judge me ... Those who judge me don't matter" |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to James T. Kucaba For Your Post: |
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 09:20 PM
|
#7 | ||||||
|
That is a pretty nice compromise without being too specific. It works for me until we get some more specific measurements from original Parker barrels. By the way, the minimum barrel wall thickness of my #6 frame ten gauge is .100. I feel fairly comfortable shooting the old
2 1/4 ounce copper fours in that one. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 12:23 PM
|
#8 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Steve Huffman For Your Post: |
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 12:35 PM
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Do you numbers change if it is a 10 ga?
Ray |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-22-2010, 12:50 PM
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Robin: You might include some of the stuff here
http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthr...wall+thickness
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post: |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode