|
Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
|
 |
Runge Engraving |
 |
03-09-2013, 10:34 AM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts
|
|
Runge Engraving
In the interest of collecting, following are photos of a 1939 C 12, the last records documented C. The picture panel engraving has been attributed by several knowledgeable collectors to Runge, and I believe that to be the case from my comparision of many higher grade guns.
I think these are Ryman line setters.
I cannot attribute the scroll work to Runge, yes there is more of it than lower graded guns, but the more open and larger style is common to many Parker grades in later years. I believe the scroll work became progressively larger and more open from about mid 20's on or even prior. I have several C's made in the 1900-1905 timeframe and some have scrollwork more open than others. The same trend follows in A grades.
The tight, compact, scroll of turn of century guns and prior progessed to open and looser scroll in many makers, including best grade London guns; I believe that is best attributed to changing styles rather than cost cutting, decreasing engraver ability or other factors that are sometimes stated. The more open scroll style is seen in high grade guns where presumably cost was not a factor.
I have seen posts here stating that G grade engraving subjects remained the same throughout production. However, in the early 1930's the picture panel subjects generally changed to bobwhite quail from the earlier generic gamebirds that are arguably prairie grouse. I believe these were most likely done by journeyman engravers rather than the master engravers such as Runge or those on Parker retainer. They do not exhibit the fine line and complex engraving of Runge. My understanding of production shop methods is that scroll work and picture panel work in lower grade guns is left to less accomplished engravers while the picture panel work in high grade guns is reserved for the masters.
Finally, and for comparision, there is a picture of one of my favorites, a pre 1900 gun. The differences in engraving are striking . Note the fine scroll and complex engraving, but styles quickly changed for these guns. It has also sometimes been said and is even stated in TPS, that the frame sculpting grooves became shorter as time went by, but the reader might look at the two guns.
|
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
|
allen newell, Bob Roberts, craig reynolds, David Dwyer, David Holes, E Robert Fabian, Eric Eis, Frank Cronin, John Havard, Josh Loewensteiner, Linn Matthews, Mike Franzen, Paul Ehlers, Ralph English, Richard Flanders, Robert Rambler, Todd Kaltenbach |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno - 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.
|