![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Bill, I think 8 gauge guns were marked EH and NH respectively.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
I'm fairly sure my 8 is a GH according to the PGCA letter.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Somewhere around 1905/07 the EH/NH designation was dropped and these guns were simply G grade and P grade guns.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Greg, I'm not interested in what your letter says, I want to know what the letter is on the water table and only if it was made in the 1889 to about 1910 range.
Dave, that's why I only want hammerless 8 gauge gun prior to the EH/NH being dropped. I couldn't find the exact date the EH was dropped in my price lists. The reason I ask is because I just did a letter for a member on a Grade 2 gun which was an 8 gauge. The price was $85 for the EH plus $35 for the 8 guage upgrade for a total of $120 which is what the Order Book price was. On his watertable is GH, not EH. Was this a common practice or were some guns marked GH and some marked NH? |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
'2' with no letter on the water table
161XXX |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
The Parker Story says EH/NH was only used for 10 gauges, but I have seen posts on this forum indicating it was also used on 8 gauges.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Mills is right, but the catalog tells the story correctly. If an early eight gauge is marked E or N, it is in error. Such errors are not so rare. #160,785, eight gauge, post 1910, marked 2 and GH. I have not seen a catalog entry that describes an eight gauge as an NH or an EH.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|