![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
The accepted minimum wall thickness is .025"
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Richard, I'm aware of your situation with the unnamed gunsmith, but didn't know for sure what the dimensions of your walls were.
If .017" isn't worth a tinkers damn, then I guess .010" or .012" won't be either. .025" it shall be then. Thanks for the advice. Last edited by Dave Miles; 04-30-2010 at 12:33 PM.. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
From the German proof house: minimal wall thickness at end of chamber, regardless of length, for 12, 16 & 20 gauge guns should be 2.3mm (.0906") for 'ordinary good steel' or 2.1mm (.0827") if a 'Special Steel' was used. Minimal wall of .6mm (.0236") was recomended in the "forward third" of the barrel ie. what Dean said.
One of the Greeners progressively reamed the muzzles to the point that he could trim the ends with a penknife and the barrels did not rupture/split with standard loads. I wouldn't be standing next to the gun or shooter during the experiment however.
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
I witnessed a thumb lever Purdey with paper thin muzzels unwind from a 2 1/2 Eley with #6 shot.
Harry |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Harry Collins For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Wow, maybe I'll shoot my old lifter with what I thought were thin barrels. I'll roll out an old tire and put the old A grade to a proof test. Wish me luck!
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Drew, what do the Germans say about the middle third from the "front of the chambers" forward?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
That's all I have Bill, but here's what the Brits say
UK Working Standards recomended minimum wall thickness measured 18" from the breech from Double Gun Classics p. 56, Vol. 1, No. 4 Jan-Feb, 2006: 2 1/2" 12g- .028 2 3/4" 12g- .032 Re-proof recomended minimum- .024
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Thanks, Drew. I kind of like the .032 figure, on the assumpion that some day any 2 1/2" gun will be fired with 2 3/4" shells. As some posters imply, the muzzle is no big deal except to hunters who may bang against a tree or fence post occasionally.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|