![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
I have a few Miller trigger guns and like Daryl, have never had an issue with them. I have had issues with the early Parker single triggers. Having said that, I certainly would not swap a double trigger Parker gun out to a Miller single trigger.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dan Steingraber For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
In my opinion, any single trigger is a dumb contraption and a waste of money.
But, regarding millers. They are very simple and known to be reliable. The original miller installs were not the cleanest, in fact downright crude. But they worked.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
When I was in the Miller shop a few years ago, there was a .410 Purdey on the bench. The owner must have been brain dead to have that conversion done. I wish I had questioned Howard about the gun. My Miller triggers have all worked with one exception. I understand that once a Miller trigger is installed, various internal parts of the gun are modified to the extent that they can't be returned to original. I guess that doesn't make any difference as long as the Miller trigger works OK.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
I agree with the looks aspect as they're not very appealing to the eye I was solely wondering if they were reliable. I appreciate your feedback and thank you for sharing your thoughts, Steven.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
I’ve had many Miller triggers over the years and all have been flawless. Ithaca, at one time I’m told, paid Miller a royalty to use their trigger in the NID’s. ($5.00).
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Davis For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|