![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
That's gonna give me night terrors
__________________
Before we work on artificial intelligence why don't we work on natural stupidity |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Andrew Sacco For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
I wonder what caliber it is now chambered and barreled for?
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Someone's attempt at making a Parker into a double rifle. The picture of the muzzle end shows the rifling grooves. I wonder what caliber it is?
I would call this a run, don't walk gun. Run away from it as fast as you can, unless it's free and you want it as a conversation piece in your gatherings. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Ehlers For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Yes I agree with you all. I assume the chamber of the Damascus sleeves were bored out to accept the fluid steel rifle chamber. I wouldn’t think someone would be foolish enough to try to handle rifle chamber pressures in an unsleeved Damascus chamber. Anyway the thing caught my attention as very unusual. I also meant to include that the serial number was 64503 which dates to 1891.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
It appears to be a GH grade. If the owner thinks it is a .410 it may shoot .410 slugs very well. If cheap enough, it would be an interesting gun to shoot slugs. Or it may have been chambered for .45 Long Colt. The barrels sleeved to the large chambers are probably ok to handle anything you could shoot in it. I find it interesting, and refinished it would be a unique Parker.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
.410 Parkers are hot right now.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
A while back, there was a shop in Maine doing double rifle conversions. As I recall it was either 32-40, 38-55 or 45-70.
My initial thought was that a Parker wouldn't be my choice because of only one lockup. Those cartridges originated as black powder cartridges, and most factory ammo was very mild because of their possible use in older BP guns. I've never seen one of these conversions in the flesh, but more than one (Including Bill Jr.)have told me they were first class, and one I know was a Parker that had hundreds of rounds through it, and still on face. Walter Eiserer is a close friend, and he was G&H principal 'smith for many years. He grew up and apprenticed in Austria, and knows his way around guns more so than anyone I know. He explained once when we were talking about double rifles and combo guns, that the lock up was second to how robust the hinge was. I'm somewhat at a loss how one can say it's a terrible sleeving job from one picture. I'd sure like to see what the chamber area looked like. Is the rim in the original monoblock, or new barrel? Personally, I'd love to have another DR in 9.3x72. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Edgar you are a fountain of knowledge my friend.
__________________
"A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way." |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Bishop For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|