![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
It’s been a few years back like 1990 I believe . Anyway I’d just acquired a NIN Remington SP-10 26” expressly for gobble birds and that year or the next Remington offered duplex loads in 10 3 1/2” , 12 3” and I think 12 2 3/4” . I bought some for the 10 and the 12 3” . Well as I remmember they patterned okay at 20 and 40 yards . The 12’s were 4’s and 6’s if my memory serves and seems to me the 10’s were 2’s and 4’s .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines ! |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
If the sixes don't cut the mustard then just load fours. IMO, there is nothing to be gained by mixing the two.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
I tried that but pattern density was pretty thin at 40-45 yards. Another thought I had was using Steel Shot Wads. I might try that if the duplex loads don't work out. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Austin,
With large shot you often have to buffer the load to achieve decent patterns. I can't imagine 6's not being able to do the job. Of course there is always the .22 if you can use it where you hunt.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
I developed a long range load that was based on the slowest powder I could find - 800X. My thought is that the slow burn doesn't distort the shot. I don't believe it would ever be a commercial success because it had mimimal recoil, and would be viewed as "Weak"
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am" |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
I’ve hand-rolled duplex and triplex loads for upland birds. Usually 6, 7 1/2 and 8 in the triplex and 7 1/2-6 or 5-6 in the duplex. I never patterned them but bagged plenty of birds with them. I use my usual 1 oz recipes and just add my mixed shot.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
I've loaded (5) shells with 5/8 oz. of 6's under 1/2 oz. of 4's, and will pattern test them this week. I will also try the same loading, but will use a steel shot wad with buffering to see if it would tighten the group. I'll post the results after testing.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Austin J Hawthorne Jr. For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|