![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
There is not a single fact recited in that story by which its truth can be investigated. The first thing a BS artist does is to make sure his story has nothing by which an investigator could find out the guy is lying. If he worked in a gunshop, he would know the town, the name of the gunsmith; all of which are conveniently omitted.
So the usual concocted story has some unverifiable "facts" to justify an unwarranted conclusion. This conclusion is that a damascus barrel just ruptures catastrophically without any prior indications. I suppose all barrels can do that, but posters here have shown enough photos of bulged damascus and fluid steel guns so that any reasonable person knows that his conclusion that all damascus barrels fail in that manner is nonsense. I am not an expert in Parkers or guns in general, but I do know that many of these gun chat forums are sheer nonsense and as cocktail hour(s) drag on, the BS gets deeper. This PGCA forum, L C Smith and a few other moderated forums where the posters generally know each other and who is full of it and who is reliable, are the exceptions in a vast sea of internet drivel. As an aside, there is some site for gun talk called a campfire cracker barrel. I think it should be renamed to beer barrel. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
I think Bruce about said it all.
In my time with Parkers and other older SXS shotguns I think we've seen about as many fluid steel catastrophic failures as Damascus catastrophic failures.... which proves nothing either way. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Such stories are true and the word should be spread across the land as it had been before. We should put a something to this effect on the PGCA website:
Damascus and Twist barrels are dangerous, guns so equipped are worthless paperweights, especially anything stamped Parker Bros. Although you know this is a dangerous gun your heirs may not. You want to avoid any future harm. Fortunately for you, the owners of these dangerous and junk guns there are a few folks who simply want to admire the work of the artisans who built them. We provide a proper and safe disposal service and we will pay a small fee plus shipping to prevent these dangerous relics from hurting you or your loved ones. If you own such a gun contact any of the following PGCA members for an evaluation and disposal instructions. ![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Pete,
Please have them all shipped to my home address... ![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
my parker 8 ga may blow up tommorrow but shes swallowed up to as much as 3 ounce loads without a whimper.....and its damascus....thanks for theinfo and story on damascus..... charlie
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
I took damascus DH 12 out phez. hunting yesterday. Made in 97. Rolled up 10 shells and labeled dam. 7.5. Took a limit of 3 roosters and no arms. First time hunting with dam. gun. Sure was fun letting her work again. We won't wait another 50 years to go again. Our phez. numbers are low so I think she brought good luck.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to David Holes For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
The Brits have shown ever since the introduction of fluid steel that their Damascus or Twist steel guns can be reproved by being able to withstand proof loads which are much in excess of ordinary game loads and are marked accordingly. Perhaps we should have a proof house on this side of the pond as well. JMHO.
Best Regards, George |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to George Lander For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
A proof house here? Unless it was mandated by the gummint I don't think we'll ever see one. I for one, would never subject any of my guns, Damascus or fluid steel to the extremes that a proof house might. I don't think in the ten or fifteen years I have remaining to shoot and hunt I could ever equal the stress using 7,500 p.s.i. loads I put upon my guns that one visit to a proof house would. Thanks, but no thanks.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|