Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Chamber Length
Unread 10-18-2010, 09:56 AM   #1
Member
Vaughn Jones
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default Chamber Length

New to this. I bought a Parker 20 gauge O frame SN 165683 which I understand was built in 1913. I have been told to take it to a gunsmith to determine the chamber length and correct shell length, but don't have one in this area that gives me any confidence, or even one that I would trust to handle it. I fired a couple 2 3/4 inch light target loads through it and it kicked like a 16, but with the big drop at the heel, hard to tell.

I know you guys have dealt with this before. Anyone know if this is 2 3/4, 2 1/2 or something else?

Also, it has a dent that is barely visible about 10" from the muzzle on the full choke barrel. Could this become a problem?
Vaughn Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-18-2010, 10:25 AM   #2
Member
David Hamilton
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 289
Thanks: 290
Thanked 75 Times in 56 Posts

Default

There are some inexpensive steel plugs that are made in various bores that you can put in your chamber and measure the length. I can't remember , but I think I got them from Lyman or Mid-Way. David
David Hamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-18-2010, 10:35 AM   #3
Member
Double Play
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Larry Frey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,308
Thanks: 944
Thanked 2,796 Times in 642 Posts

Default

Hi Vaughn,
It has been said that long shells in short chambers can increase recoil. Also as you indicated excessive DAH tends to hit you a little harder or so it seems. If you plan to shoot your gun much you may want to pick up some low pressure shells as it will increase your shooting pleaser and be gentler on the gun. I believe a smaller payload (3/4 oz/20 gage) in tightly chocked guns gives less recoil and better patterns.
Larry Frey is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-18-2010, 11:27 AM   #4
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,846
Thanks: 38,443
Thanked 35,764 Times in 13,106 Posts

Default

I agree with Larry completely. I have a 1928 VH 20 gauge that abuses me mercilessly if I use standard off the shelf ammo. It has 2 1/2" chambers and just doesn't like those shells at all. I will not even shoot that gun with anything but 2 1/2" RST 5/8 or 3/4 oz. loads.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-18-2010, 01:20 PM   #5
Member
D. Shane Burton
Forum Associate
 
D. Shane Burton's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 51
Thanks: 21
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Default

RST, website of company referenced by Dean Romig:

http://www.rstshells.com/

Shane
D. Shane Burton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-18-2010, 05:45 PM   #6
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,841
Thanks: 1,833
Thanked 8,683 Times in 2,555 Posts

Default

Parker Bros. certainly didn't rush into making the chambers of their 20-gauge guns longer after Western Cartridge Co. introduced their 20-gauge Super-X shel in a 2 3/4 inch case in 1922. A year earlier Remington Arms Co., Inc. introduced their sleek little Model 17 pump gun for the 2 3/4 inch 20-gauge shell. I've got a 1930-vintage, VH-Grade, 26-inch barrel, 0-frame, 20-gauge and it is chambered for the old style 2 1/2 inch 20-gauge shell. With Parker Bros. policy of holding chambers 1/8 inch shorter than the intended shell, their guns actually have 2 3/8 inch chambers. Same with A.H. Fox Gun Co.

Chamber depth is considered to be the distance between the breech end of the barrels and the joint between the chamber body itself and the forcing cone, which reduces down to bore diameter. This is loosely based on the length of the "Fired" shell. Today, theoretically when the crimp opens on the shell being fired the end would land at the junction of the chamber and cone. Prior to WW-II many companies had the practice of holding the chamber about 1/8 inch shorter than the shell for which it was intended. Fly in the ointment is nominal measurements often differ from actual ones in both chambers and shells. A very good method I have found of measuring chambers without much outlay of cash, and is quite accurate enough for virtually any situation, is a common 6" flexible machinist's scale which you likely have. Hold the barrels with muzzles toward a light source, not necessarily a concentrated one a window is great, while looking into the breech and the cone will be thrown in a shadow. May have to move the barrels around a little until it is distinct. While still looking into the chamber simply slide the scale in until you observe the end coming flush with the shadow line & mark position of breech end with your thumb. Remove and read the scale. I usually repeat this a few times to insure I am getting a consistent reading, but you will be amazed how accurate this can be done. While I own a Galazan chamber gauge, I use this more often than not. The chamber body itself has a taper of about .005" per inch. Sometimes chambers were cut with slightly worn reamers giving a slight undersize chamber. If the chamber is a bit undersize a gauge made to "industry" standards will not go in to the true depth of the chamber. A.H. Fox Gun Co. shotguns are known for having tight chambers. The machinist’s scale method can be more accurate.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 10-18-2010, 07:17 PM   #7
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,971
Thanks: 1,270
Thanked 5,286 Times in 1,499 Posts

Default

I use the same method as Dave and it works great.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-19-2010, 08:45 AM   #8
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

I have 20ga Parkers from 1902, 1910 and 1927. I follow the Parker recommended loads for these guns of 3/4oz at 2 1/4DRE or max 7/8oz at 2 1/2DRE. ( from Parker brochure The Small Bore Shot Gun, p. 9) Works great.

If you have chosen a gun having significant DAH, the felt recoil will be greater. Most of those little upland 20's have about 2 1/2"DAH, mine do. If you have been shooting so called "light target loads" through it, you have been shooting the Parker recommended maximum load.

Now subjectively, I shoot the lighter loads at targets and the heavier loads at larger gamebirds.

FYI, Win AA's are 2 5/8" when fired. They work fine in a Parker 2 1/2" chambered 20ga, which was the standard Parker 20ga chamber for many years.

The barely visible dent you mention is cosmetic only.

Last edited by Bruce Day; 10-19-2010 at 09:09 AM..
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Was it a Typo?
Unread 10-19-2010, 09:50 PM   #9
Member
Austin W Hogan
PGCA Invincible
Life Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 676
Thanks: 0
Thanked 408 Times in 197 Posts

Default Was it a Typo?

Bruce is exactly correct; note the modern AA 20 laying alongside the machinist's scale in the first photo; it measures 2 5/8 inches after being fired. More surprising is the Super X Twenty 1 1/8 ounce maximum load magnum on the opposite side of the scale. The 3.20 on the box is the price paid in Van Horne's Hardware in Fultonville NY in the late 1950's. I don't have a fired 2 magnum, but I have a fired Super X twenty ga 5 from the same place and time surviving in the box of fives. The Super X five measures 2 11/16 minus in the second photo.
Both of these boxes are labeled 2 3/4 Inch, and carry a stern warning not to fire these in guns with chambers shorter than the length on the label.
The third photo shows a 1930's (or perhaps 1940's) vintage Remington Kleanbore Shurshot. It measures 2 5/8 minus
I have only had two Remington Parkers in residence here. Both were traps, and both sets of chambers measured 2 3/4, although they may have been lengthened along the way.
We have heard the story of shells longer than the chamber sealing on the mouth many times. The only publication found to substantiate this was contributed by Ed Muderlak; around 1933, an industry professional fired 3 inch magnums in a 410, and found patterns improved over 2 1/2 shells, although 1/2 inch was burned off the case on each firing.
The Remington shop order to chamber Parkers "2 5/8 inches for 2 3/4 inch shells" is well known. Could it have been a typo intended to say "2 3/4 chambers for 2 5/8 shells? The SAAMI standard (2.75 - .100) seems to support this.

Let's renew the search for a pre 1934 citation of short chambering

Best, Austin
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SUPER X 20 MAGNUM CA 1955web.jpg (18.5 KB, 226 views)
File Type: jpg SUPER X 5 web.jpg (20.5 KB, 226 views)
File Type: jpg SHURSHOT 12web.jpg (22.7 KB, 226 views)
Austin W Hogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-20-2010, 10:39 PM   #10
Member
Vaughn Jones
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default

I want to thank each of you for your advice. You have really been helpful and I am impressed with the depth of knowledge in this organization. I plan to try out some 2 1/2 inch shells and see if it is a more comfortable shoot. Will report back to you.

Best wishes,

Vaughn Jones
Vaughn Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.