Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Pattern Test?
Unread 01-07-2017, 09:43 PM   #1
Member
Jim McKee
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 486
Thanks: 1,986
Thanked 664 Times in 203 Posts

Default Pattern Test?

Did Parker pattern test all their 12 and 10 bore shotguns?
Was there a standard shot size used when pattern testing their 10 bore shotguns?
Thanks!
Jim
Jim McKee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-07-2017, 10:06 PM   #2
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,888
Thanks: 38,515
Thanked 35,805 Times in 13,129 Posts

Default

From the records we have Parker Bros. probably patterned all of their shotguns. During various time periods they used various shot sizes, various sizes and shapes of 'circles', and various yardages at which they were tested.

Have you ordered a letter for a gun you may have in mind? There may be patterning records for your gun.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-08-2017, 07:01 AM   #3
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,263
Thanks: 368
Thanked 4,251 Times in 1,379 Posts

Default

Parker SN 1500 (c. 1878) - 4200 (c. 1884) patterning was done at 45 yards in a 18 x 24 oval or possibly a rectangle. Between SNs 4500 and 86000 patterning was at 45 yards in a 24" circle.

After 1896, Parker used the standard 40 yards in a 30" circle. (Courtesy of Chuck Bishop)

12g Parker SN 71792 c. 1891 was patterned with 1 1/4 oz. No. 7 and 42 grains (3 1/4 Drams) DuPont Bulk.

A 1900 Parker hang tag states that 12g 2 5/8” chambered guns were patterned at 40 yds. in a 30” circle using a 2 5/8” shell with 1 1/8 oz. No. 7 chilled shot and 40 grains ( 3 1/4 Drams) of DuPont Bulk Smokeless powder. (Courtesy of Bruce Day)



1920s tags listed both 1 1/8 oz. and 1 1/4 oz., still with DuPont Bulk Smokeless.

A 1924 16g was patterned with a 2 9/16” shell, 1 oz. No. 7 Tatham chilled shot (291 per oz.), and 2 1/2 Drams Bulk Smokeless.

A 1925 20g tag lists a 2 1/2” shell, 7/8 oz. No. 7, and 2 1/4 Bulk Smokeless.

Last edited by Drew Hause; 01-09-2017 at 05:18 PM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 01-08-2017, 07:47 AM   #4
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,888
Thanks: 38,515
Thanked 35,805 Times in 13,129 Posts

Default

You can usually determine the "choke" of a Parker by the number of pellets of a prescribed size within the circle at a given yardage.

For instance, 220 pellets of number 7 chilled in a 24-inch circle at forty-five yards would probably be full choke in a 12-gauge gun.

The tag shown however, is for a gun that would probably have been patterned at forty yards in a thirty-inch circle.



.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-08-2017, 09:06 AM   #5
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,598
Thanks: 3,328
Thanked 13,129 Times in 3,476 Posts

Default

There are plenty of records indicating the customer wanted a particular shot size and quantity into a smaller circle. Most grouse hunters would find the info of a 40 yard test pattern useless, knowing full well their average shot was between 20 and 30 yards.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-08-2017, 09:11 AM   #6
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,263
Thanks: 368
Thanked 4,251 Times in 1,379 Posts

Default

What Edgar said
http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthread.php?t=20289

Scroll down a bit here for the pattern methods of other U.S. makers
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...UOZEFU/preview

Hunter Arms 1906 catalog courtesy of David Williamson


Last edited by Drew Hause; 01-08-2017 at 09:57 AM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 01-08-2017, 10:40 AM   #7
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,496
Thanks: 6,734
Thanked 9,848 Times in 5,227 Posts

Default

I wonder if Parker Brothers subscribed to the same blarny about "less penetration in tight chokes" that Smith writes about?
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-08-2017, 12:49 PM   #8
Member
John Truitt
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 965
Thanks: 1,887
Thanked 1,075 Times in 338 Posts

Default

Mr Murphy,

Could you please elaborate re: the penetration in tight chokes.
I don't understand.

Thank you.

John
John Truitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-08-2017, 01:06 PM   #9
Member
Jeff K.
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Admin

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,440
Thanks: 922
Thanked 3,049 Times in 693 Posts

Default

John,
Read the Hunter Arms catalog page that Drew included.
Jeff Kuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-08-2017, 02:51 PM   #10
Member
John Truitt
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 965
Thanks: 1,887
Thanked 1,075 Times in 338 Posts

Default

Mr Murphy refers to less penetration.

The way I read the article they seem to be referring to greater penetration with a full choke but less with something ultra tight like a modern turkey choke. they make no reference to the degree or measure of constriction to determine one vs the other.

Am I missing something?

I may be thinking too modern as in choke being determined by thousandths of constriction vs the actual down range pattern. IMO the actual down range pattern is the best measure but I was looking for more info to establish at what point or measure of constriction do we start to get less penetration (55 thous vs 60 or what? Is 40 thou the optimum/ etc)

Mr Murphy is and has a wealth of knowledge. I thought maybe he knew something beyond what was posted above.
John Truitt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Truitt For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.