Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
When did Parker change the headstock inletting?
Unread 01-03-2012, 12:26 PM   #1
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,603
Thanks: 3,332
Thanked 13,140 Times in 3,481 Posts

Default When did Parker change the headstock inletting?

My 20 bore 0 frame project is temporarily stalled. I've located a few good candidates to replace the (possibly Fajen) aftermarket stock, but this is an early gun, 1900, and there is a fairly significant difference in the in-letting of the headstock. Parts literature refers to a 'Model 10' change in the sear springs, but it seems that the back of the hammer profile is quite different in early vs late actions. This gun has the longer, more flat, lever, and all of these changes may have occurred at the same time.
Someone alot better than me could probably remove enough of the wood to make it conform to the earlier type, but before I go down that road, it would be nice to know when the change was made, and possibly find an earlier stock candidate. The gun is a simple VH, 0 frame 28" 20. Apart from the replaced wood, it's a pretty nice little gun.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2012, 02:38 PM   #2
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,072
Thanks: 531
Thanked 19,764 Times in 4,983 Posts

Default

The change occured when the bolt operating was changed on the guns. Parts were reduced as well as method of bolt operation. Not sure of the year off the top of my head. Was it 1918?

There is much more wood in the later buttstock heads since there are less parts needed to open the bolt and since the hammers do not draw back as far.

Worse case, if you have a later one, but need an earlier one. You can remove the required wood from the later one to make it work.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 01-03-2012, 03:36 PM   #3
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,603
Thanks: 3,332
Thanked 13,140 Times in 3,481 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
The change occured when the bolt operating was changed on the guns. Parts were reduced as well as method of bolt operation. Not sure of the year off the top of my head. Was it 1918?
This gun has the V spring type.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
There is much more wood in the later buttstock heads since there are less parts needed to open the bolt and since the hammers do not draw back as far.

Worse case, if you have a later one, but need an earlier one.
Makes sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
You can remove the required wood from the later one to make it work.
By 'You', you're referring to anyone but me. My wood working tools are limited to baseball bats and chainsaws. Well, not really; I do build a pretty nice, true mortise and tennon post and beam building, and I've restored some nice antique boats, but I think it best I leave wood working on guns as nice as these to people like you, not me.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2012, 08:58 AM   #4
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,072
Thanks: 531
Thanked 19,764 Times in 4,983 Posts

Default

Yeah, the V type spring was the early style bolt operation where the hammers draw back into the stock.

'You' was a bit of a general term. Was just saying that it can be fitted to work. However, something more delecate than a chain saw would be required.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 01-04-2012, 10:23 AM   #5
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,603
Thanks: 3,332
Thanked 13,140 Times in 3,481 Posts

Default

I have 6 chainsaws. Not even my little trimmer? Damn, I know my baseball bat won't do it either.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2012, 04:48 PM   #6
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 758 Times in 419 Posts

Default

Oh, you put some blueing on the metal parts, push it back togeather, take it apart, and you'll know where to remove some wood. Do it all over 20 to 100 times and you'll be in business. Piece of cake if you have the patience. paul
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 01-07-2012, 08:09 PM   #7
Member
Bob Brown
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 489
Thanks: 120
Thanked 499 Times in 215 Posts

Default

Although it isn't really definate it says in The Parker Story the coil spring top lever spring came out in the 2 frame Trojan in 1918 and was phased in to the other grades. By 1926 the catalogue mentions all having the new spring.
Bob Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-07-2012, 09:10 PM   #8
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,603
Thanks: 3,332
Thanked 13,140 Times in 3,481 Posts

Default

Thanks Bob. That's the info I was after.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.