Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Revisions by Parker?
Unread 04-22-2011, 09:45 PM   #1
Member
WHO
PGCA Member
 
Wayne Owens's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 491
Thanks: 2,619
Thanked 1,729 Times in 280 Posts

Default Revisions by Parker?

This is an update to my original post regarding the chance of the serialization book being incorrect. Attached are some photos I took today of the gun in question. Please review them and tell me your opinions on whether Parker did the revisions to the gun. I don't know what the repair code stamped into the gun means. I also don't know what the letters behind the triggers mean. I assume the sideways R stamped into the stock means a replacement stock. The ventilated rib does not have the last three digits of the serial number stamped into it's underside.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC02642.JPG (311.6 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02643.JPG (287.3 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02649.JPG (236.8 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02651.JPG (264.9 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02658.JPG (260.2 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02660.JPG (213.0 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02663.JPG (157.2 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02664.JPG (188.1 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02665.JPG (200.3 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02666.JPG (192.0 KB, 15 views)
Wayne Owens is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wayne Owens For Your Post:
Unread 04-22-2011, 10:11 PM   #2
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,848
Thanks: 38,444
Thanked 35,765 Times in 13,107 Posts

Default

It appears to have had a single trigger at one time. The R is for Right barrel on the selector switch which was in the position where the rear trigger occupies presently. The stock appears to be an original Parker or Remington replacement, hence the R stamped into the wood. The Ser & ID book won't necessarily show what a gun went back to Parker for. I suggest you get a Research Letter.

XD5 and XC3 are two seperate Remington repair codes.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 04-23-2011, 12:49 AM   #3
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Wayne, responding to your direct personal request to me for comment, the stock looks dead on correct. I concur with Dean's assessment.

The vent rib looks correct. The last three of the SN should be stamped in the underside of the rib between the second and third support posts from the rear. But if not there, its not indicative of the rib being aftermarket in this case.

There are some guns with extra checkering details such as this one.

A nice and interesting gun.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 04-23-2011, 08:13 AM   #4
Member
Jared V.
Forum Associate
 
Jared Valeski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 112
Thanks: 101
Thanked 88 Times in 27 Posts

Default

In the last picture shown, there is a hole visable in the lower tang behind the rear trigger. Is this a remnant of the straight stock? There is no doubt the ventilated rib is original to the gun as the area where the rib extension meets the action is flat rather than concave. Is there a repair to the rib at the muzzle? A picture of the muzzle from the end would be appreciated.
Jared Valeski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jared Valeski For Your Post:
Unread 04-23-2011, 08:32 AM   #5
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Wayne, your B has some extra checkering details, which is an interesting plus. Here is a C also with a little extra.

Parkers are all about the details.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 100_7148.jpg (92.9 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg 100_7151.jpg (82.7 KB, 6 views)
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 04-23-2011, 09:38 AM   #6
Member
WHO
PGCA Member
 
Wayne Owens's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 491
Thanks: 2,619
Thanked 1,729 Times in 280 Posts

Default

Here are some additional pictures of the gun:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg endcap.jpg (183.0 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg foreend.jpg (194.9 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg muzzle.jpg (165.3 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg muzzle2.jpg (179.8 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg triggers.jpg (194.5 KB, 9 views)
Wayne Owens is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-23-2011, 09:49 AM   #7
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,848
Thanks: 38,444
Thanked 35,765 Times in 13,107 Posts

Default

The extra holes, one open and one plugged, are remnants of the single trigger screws that were in those positions, I believe. Dave Suponski will know for sure - he has one or two with that single trigger setup.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 04-23-2011, 09:49 AM   #8
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Wayne, I am no Parker expert, but I think the rib end has come loose in the past, that's why the striations on the end rib post, and may be loose again, or could be better repaired.


As I said a couple months ago, this is a target gun, and a nice one.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Revisions by Parker?
Unread 04-23-2011, 09:55 AM   #9
Member
Richard LaMendola
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 22
Thanks: 18
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts

Default Revisions by Parker?

Wayne, What I find interesting is the front site bead. I have the same bead on a Lefever DS circa 1907. Yours is the only other one I've seen. Rich
Richard LaMendola is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Richard LaMendola For Your Post:
Unread 04-23-2011, 10:01 AM   #10
Member
WHO
PGCA Member
 
Wayne Owens's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 491
Thanks: 2,619
Thanked 1,729 Times in 280 Posts

Default

Thanks for all of your input. My mind is made up; I am going to try to swing a deal on this gun.
Wayne Owens is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.