![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage! | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
At the end of the barrel, right .758, left:.754, I have no way of measuring nine inches inside the barrel to obtain barrel inside diameter. I assume it is the 12 gauge standard 729-.730.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
The bore is just oversized. This is common. I have seen plenty of 12g guns with near 10g sized bores than still had plenty of choke in them.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
To Brians point my Quality T Hammer 12 bore from 1891 has bores that measure .755 and .754 with choke constrictions of .037 and .038.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Randy G Roberts For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
I will try to borrow a gauge to measure the inside of the barrels, but there is a visible outward flair of the end of the barrels.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Photos?
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
I own a number of 12 and 10 ga Parkers and every one is a perfect bore size larger. The 12s are 11 gauge and the 10s are 9 ga. The Parker Story discusses and lists the date the factory records say they switched to standard size barrels unless the larger barrels are ordered.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Finally measured bores, 0.750 four inches inside muzzle, 0.750 two inches past chamber, both barrels. .758 and 0.754 at end of barrels (muzzle).
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Danner For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
That sounds untouched for a typical bore of that vintage, although they were starting to phase them out. Sounds like someone reamed the chokes out.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|