![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
The way you’re question is phrased, which looks best is going to be in the eye of the beholder. Some guys like that honest, well worn look. I really like the look of high grade guns that have been used for their intended purpose. Others only like pristine condition. Given the choice between the 2 guns pictured I’d take gun number 2 every time. Gun number 1 looks like the finished was polished off imho.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mike Franzen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Neither gun is in high condition but so what. They both have character and are nice examples of Parker Brothers shotguns. Assuming general overall good condition, I'd fix the buggered screws and enjoy the guns the way they are.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
a) grade ($ budget) b) gauge (also a budget item) c) barrel length d) wall thickness e) frame size f) stock dimensions g) mechanical function/integrity h) wood fit and figure i) engraving wear j) case coloring k) barrel bluing l) chokes |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
I could deal with either of them . I 100% prefer original even if the guns less than 30% . Now with that being said the 8 gauge in my care is totally redone , but I doubt if I could’ve afforded another like it that was let’s say 50% or better .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines ! |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Steven:
I can’t argue with your list. But, in my humble opinion, I would say that any listing of the elements between A and L would be considerably modified by the attribute of originality, i.e., c) are Barrels of original length? j) is gun RE-case-colored? (as Greg (WILD SKIES) said). f) is stock tinkered with, including non-factory pads added after-market? k) are barrels RE-blued? l) are chokes opened after-market, and not by the factory? a) even the issue of Grade relates to originality, should the gun have been up-graded. To illustrate how kaleidoscopic the process of evaluating these qualities can be, here is a 12-gauge DHE that is apparently all original, but not high-condition. All that should complicate the application of the very relevant features you list. If collecting criteria were easy, who would bother?
__________________
"First off I scoured the Internet and this seems to be the place to be!” — Chad Whittenburg, 5-12-19 |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Russell E. Cleary For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
That’s why most PGCA members will recommend caution about making alterations to the guns. Sometimes it’s necessary to keep the gun functional. Sometimes it’s purely cosmetic. A person can unknowingly reduce the value of a gun because of lack of knowledge / experience. What might seem like a great idea for your gun might backfire. A good policy before doing anything is to post about it here or if you know someone with true expertise talk to them.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Mike Franzen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Preservation versus conservation versus appreciation (not financial).
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Steven Groh For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|