![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
If the 2 7/8" chambers were made for paper cartridges and not for brass.... why wouldn't 3" shells be just about perfect for them?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
My point is the 1/8" shorter chamber for better gas seal somehow does not seem to apply to the hammerless Short Tens. Whether built in the 1890's or in the early 20th century they are all pretty much 2 7/8" chambers and the paper shells sold in 10 gauge were predominantly 2 7/8" in length.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Was that 2 7/8" length measured before or after firing?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
I'm sure that is true today but would that also have applied during the era when these guns were made?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
i have some 80 year old 10 ga. hulls, i will check and let you know, scott
Ok just checked very old Winchester and Remington factory hulls. the win, was 2.900 that is .025 longer the 7/8ths and rem. was 2.850 that is .025 shorter now i went and checked a fed 3 1/2 inch new empty hull and it was 3.400 that's .100 shorter than a 3 1/2 inch ???? i think we are cutting hairs with shell length ? "the investigation continues"
__________________
No man laid on his death bed and said,"I wished I would have worked more" |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
I'd be very interested in hearing from anyone who has fired factory paper 2 7/8 inch 10 gauge shells in the older lifters with 2 5/8 inch chambers without the tapered forcing cones.
I have a supply of those old peters papers but to date I've been reluctant to shoot them even though my old lifter is in good condition and has a # 3 frame. Pros? Cons? |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|