![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
This little DH 28 gage is about as far from a pigeon gun as you could get yet it was ordered without the tang safety. The only reason that makes any sense would be that the owner was used to hunting with the gun open perhaps behind pointers which would allow time to close the gun and move in for the shot.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Almost ALL smallbore guns made without safeties were not used in the pigeon rings pre- WWII. Contemporary records of pigeons shoots during the hammerless Parker period (1888-1941) are virtually silent on sub-gauge events (today 28 gauge pigeon events are held occasionally) Most 16 and 20 gauge Parkers made without safeties were built for bobwhite quail shooting which in the day was often practiced from horseback. Guns were removed from a saddle scabbard and were not loaded until the shooter had dismounted and walked towards the pointing dogs. Nash Buckingham was a well known devotee of no safety guns for upland and well as waterfowling and had atleast 3 custom made Foxes made without one. Notwithstanding this, many 12 gauge safetyless guns never shot a pigeon but were used for trapshooting clay targets.
Last edited by Don Kaas; 01-06-2010 at 12:44 PM.. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Don Kaas For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Owning and shooting a couple guns without mechanical safeties has made me very aware of what I've got in my hands. The primary safety is what's between your ears, and making the transition back to a gun with a safety takes a little more concentration. It's made me a safer shooter. Dang Larry, is that your 28? That gun probably rode in a scabbard, unloaded, and only loaded when its gentleman owner dismounted his horse to take a shot. Nice.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Don, the quail hunting makes sense. If this one was built for quail hunting why the longer barrels, tight chokes and 2 7/8 chambers (assuming they are orginal)? I already know we can only hazard a guess at this point.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Larry's little DH 28 ga was most certainly (in my opinion) an upland gun and as Larry suggests, was only closed when walking in on the point, again, in my opinion. It is choked rt.-open and left-tight and was great fun to shoot on a SC course for small gauges. That one just slipped away from me when Larry decided to move it.
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Thanks for enlightening me, Gentlemen.
I thought maybe a quail gun, didn't think about a pigeon gun. I am still adjusting to a striker fired handgun, so personally I'll keep a safety on my shotguns. Thanks again for the replies. Dave |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
190874, a SG VHE 20 2 bbl. set has no safety. #1 bbl. is 32" with 2&7/8" chambers choked tight & tight; #2 bbl. is 28" choked IC & M. Bbl. #1 weighs a couple ozs. less than #2; both balance at the pin.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Fred- sounds like some Southern boy's dream dove/"bird" gun or a California sport's answer to ducks in the Valley and California quail in the foothills...
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|