![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
very nive shotguns.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to wayne goerres For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
The 56 is often made as a pigeon gun. In a short barrel 20 gauge it is just a nicer and stronger gun than the #2. It differs from the #2 in that the #56 has side clips, third fastener, and a dedicated larger frame than the other models.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
That is definitely more than a $3500 gun, considering the side clips and third fastener and great engraving. The single trigger is a tossup depending on whether it gives you any problem or not. I would love to own that gun. By the way, let's see the wood.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Thanks Bill, I prefer double triggers too. The wood is fairly plain European walnut, has a dark oil stain like earlier British shotguns. Inletting & checkering is good but not great for a sidelock shotgun. Today's AYAs seem to have nicer wood figure, a glossier finish, and overall better fit & finish, but are much more expensive. IMO the engraving today is not quite as fine and may be done with a machine except on higher grades, but I'm no expert on these.
![]() ![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
That is not a bad piece of walnut. A reoil would do wonders.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|