![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
I think it would be pretty hard for any of us to turn down any firearm.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
For nearly 100 years we have gotten along just fine with six shotgun sizes -- 10-, 12-, 16-, 20- and 28-gauges and .410-bore. Probably all we really need is the 10-, 16- and 28-gauges.
By 100 years ago we really had all the centerfire rifle cartridges we have any use for. Everything we've gotten since then is just manufacturers trying to sell newguns. My choice of six centerfire rifle cartridges would be the .22 WCF which morphed into the .22 Hornet, the .22 Savage High Power, the 7x57mm Mauser, the .30 govt. 06, the .375 H&H, and some good lever action and autoloader cartridge like the .300 Savage, though it didn't come along until 1920. Guess I'm discounting those rimmed cartridges for those 19th century, tubular magazine, Winchesters and Marlins!! |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
the advent of high quality, high power optics necessitated the need for ultra accurate rifle cartridges...such as the .222 Remington. when everything is just right, one can actually shoot five shots into one hole at 100 yards!
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to ed good For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
I'm not much of a rifle guy, so I have not had many one holers that stayed that way over a period of years. One is a pre Remington .22 Varminter on a #6 FN Mauser single shot action. Another is an early Ruger Model 77 in 7MM Remington Magnum. Varminter groups I have in my files are as small as .025 inches at 100 yards. The Ruger targets have been superimposed over each other since the seventies and the master 100 yard target is still just about an inch. The Redfield 4X scope has never been adjusted. I think I could get along with these two rifles and my M2 Springfield .22 Sporter that will also put them in under an inch if I use the Wolf Match Target ammunition that it likes.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
I've shot ALOT of targets from the bench and only twice have I shot groups less then a tenth of an inch (meaning the size of the group after subtracting the bullet diameter). And the second time I did it I was shooting a heavy barreled 222 REM . It was a factory rifle as a matter of fact although I had the trigger pull down to less then a pound .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines ! |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines ! |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Since I didn't get any reaction to my last post, I won't tell you about the 1.97" 600 yard target I saw this morning. Yes, it was a Parker guy who shot it. Obviously, he has interests in shooting beyond Parkers. Maybe a reread of the "target" would be in order.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
bill: extraordinary! he must have been shooting an a1 special.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|