![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
The first picture is so magnified, if it is the original fit, it's made to appear worse, but it could easily be as it was when it left the factory. The last one is how an original gun should look, regardless how many shots have gone downrange. The middle two pictures, again over magnified, appear as though they may be replacement barrels.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Keep in mind, too, that the "fit" you're seeing is only at the top. You cannot see how much better it may be fitting at the bottom. Only smoking will really tell the tale.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
I agree with Edgar with the exception of the middle two, to me, indicate the barrels have been tightened to the frame.
My 1898 DH came back from Russ Bickel looking somewhat like the middle two, though not quite as wide a gap, after he tightened my Titanic barrels. When I sent the gun go him it looked more like #4. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
What kind of "tightening" or gunsmithing would change the fit of the doll's head? In my opinion, only indiscriminate filing would cause these gaps. Are you sure Russ sent the gun back with the same barrels you sent to him?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
So, just to clarify, you don't really agree with me.
Putting a gun back on face involves correcting the fit of the hook and joint roll, which would not explain the gap between the frame recess and dolls head. The fitting of the rib extension to the receiver, such as shown in the last photo, is done before it is soldered to the barrel. A barrel going off face is a change in the gap between the hook and joint roll, not the fit of the rib extension. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Restored gun currently for sale on GI. I see this all the time on reworked guns.
__________________
"A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way." |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Bishop For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
I recently had a gunsmith set a Parker on face and now my rib extension appears similar to this picture. Question, is there a fix for this condition of the dolls head rib extension or is there anyone currently performing a repair for this?? I asked my smith about building this up and then refitting, he had no direct answer and nothing was done. Laser welding comes to mind??? |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Stan Hoover For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Gimme a break Bill… Of course he sent the original barrels back refitted with absolutely NO more slight wiggle. I would never question Russ’ ethics in gunsmithing. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|