![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
I suspect that it started life as the "standard" pattern and when someone recut the checkering they filled in the sides.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Not correct. Not factory work.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Pattern's been filed and filled in. Looks like a late Utica Sterly pattern. Huh?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|