|
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage! | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
03-05-2017, 10:11 AM
|
#3 | ||||||
|
If the gun had been send back to the Parker-Remington factory the letter on the gun says nothing about that.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
03-05-2017, 11:38 AM
|
#4 | ||||||
|
This has been brought up many times in the past, and while no one has brought forth a definitive answer, I am quite certain it has nothing to do with a return to the Remington factory. I have a few guns with this mark, and have had a few others which have moved on, and in two cases, I can most positively say the guns have never been to Remington. Had a gun gone to Ilion for any sort of repair work, it would have Remington repair codes stamped on the left barrel flats.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-05-2017, 12:06 PM
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Further, there would be nothing in a PGCA Research letter referencing the gun having gone to Remington for service. I submit that we have no (or scant few) records of that kind of information.
There is some confusion between those stamps being a + or an x. In fact they might be either. There are a number of stamps on Parker guns that we do not know the meaning of, other than they may be inspection stamps or stamps identifying a certain worker or contractor. There is speculation that a + on the barrel flats near the breech may be an indicator that a barrel was bored oversize and this may be true but there is no actual record in support of that theory. There is a section in The Parker Story beginning on page 569 dedicated to markings on Parkers and the chapter is very informative. See the illustration at the top of page 573 for the + at the breech of each tube. It could be an x but that would toss out the idea that it might indicate the tube being overbored. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 04:17 AM
|
#6 | ||||||
|
The OP states the X is on the fore end lug. I have seen guns marked exactly the same way. When looking at it there would be no question it was an X as opposed to a +. "Gun Show Guys" seem to always have an answer.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 06:32 AM
|
#7 | ||||||
|
Right, ask a "gun show guy."
Maybe a worker named Xavier. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 09:47 PM
|
#8 | ||||||
|
1890 CH, letters as to being returned to factory in 1908 to open chokes, but that's it.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 11:58 PM
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Nice bbls. Anyone else have an "X" gun?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-08-2017, 06:25 AM
|
#10 | ||||||
|
I have several and a couple with + stamps too.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
