![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
I've seen a 40" 8 gauge at the Southern. What a hoss. Isn't there a 36" 12 out there somewhere?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
I believe Walter P. Chrysler had a 16 ga with 40" barrels.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Here is some information I collected for a Parker Pages article that never came together. I suspect that 40 is the answer and the two larger are type-o's that could easily be 40 too.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Robin, can you comment on the 46" and 50" guns shown in your list?
Okay, I see where you comment on "the two larger" possibly being typos |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
What would the practical advantage be of using barrels that long? What would their effective range be? Just pondering.....
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
If you're out of ammo you can smack the ducks and geese out of the sky with it.
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Their use was the focus of the Parker Pages article I collected the information for, but I couldn't come up with a reasonable answer. Maybe someone will have some knowledge on the thinking back in the day on the use of "long tom" barrels.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Maybe more power/velocity due to a more fully burned powder charge... This, I think would be more necessry in the bigger gauges like the 10 and especially the 8.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|