Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Damascus Barrels & Steel

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
BBL Thickness
Unread 05-01-2013, 02:26 AM   #1
Member
Mike Franzen
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Franzen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 1,324
Thanked 4,561 Times in 1,372 Posts

Default BBL Thickness

What would be considered an acceptable bbl thickness for a PB 16 ga, damascus on a 0 frame with 26" bbls?
Mike Franzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage!
Unread 05-01-2013, 10:04 AM   #2
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 1,721
Thanked 8,381 Times in 3,310 Posts

Default

Gauge and frame would only give you a rough idea of where it started.

A search will find this topic discussed many times. Along with what was the thinnest walls that are factory original.

The thinnest damascus I shoot measures just above 30 thousands. Way more than anyone's recomened minimum.
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 05-24-2013, 09:20 AM   #3
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

It depends on the distance from the breech.

I have a rule of thumb for Damascus - minimum wall thickness of .025" (25 thousandths). But that would be too thin at the muzzle end of the forcing cones. But perfectly acceptable in the last 12 inches of the muzzle end. I have been told by barrelsmiths that 25 thousandths is the minimum they need to work with to repair a dent. So the .025" minimum in the forward end of the barrel is not about barrel bursts but about dent repairability.

Best,

Mike
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mike Shepherd For Your Post:
Unread 05-24-2013, 09:53 AM   #4
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,073
Thanks: 36,785
Thanked 34,222 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

Some say more, some say less, but 25 thou. is a good safe figure. I would even suggest, with perfectly sound barrels, the forward half of the barrel length could be 25 thou. Pressures drop off radically within the first 10 - 12 inches from the breech.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 06-04-2013, 09:38 PM   #5
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

the other number that comes to mind is 90 thousands in front of the chambers.
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-05-2013, 09:54 AM   #6
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

I copied the measurments below from a post I made on the DoubleGun BBS a few years ago.

http://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/...=224972&page=3

"I sure have a lot of doubles with original chambers and forcing cones with wall thicknesses way below .100" at the end of the chamber.

Fox A grade 16ga, 26" barrels, 2-7/16" chamber, 0.085" and 0.086" minimum wall thickness at the end of the chambers, .734" and .734" diameter at the end of the chambers, 5/8" long forcing cones, #4 barrels, gun weighs 5lbs 9oz, serial 302XXX.

Parker VH O Frame 16ga, 28" steel barrels, serial 134XXX, 2-9/16" chamber, .082" and 0.085" minimum wall thickness at the end of the chambers, 0.730" and 0.732" end chamber diameters, 3lbs 2oz unstruck barrel weight, gun weighs 5lbs 14oz.

Fox XE 16ga, 30" barrels, serial 301xxx, .072" and .080" minimum wall at chamber ends, 2-7/16" chambers, .733" and .733" end chamber diameters, gun weighs 6lbs 3oz

Parker DHE 16ga, 32" steel barrels, serial 212XXX, 0.090" and 0.092" minimum wall thickness at chamber ends, 2-9/16" chambers, .735" and .736" diameter at chamber ends, barrel unstruck barrel weight 3lbs 11oz, gun weighs 7lbs 4oz.

Lefever H grade 16 gauge, 28" twist barrels, .090" and .092" minimum wall thickness at chamber ends, 2-5/8" chambers, .729" and .728" diameter at chamber ends. Gun weighs 6lbs 4oz

Ithaca Flues Grade 4E 16 gauge, 28" Krupp fluid steel barrels, 0.091" and 0.092" minimum wall thickness at the end of 2-5/8" chambers, daimeters of .728" and .730" at the end of the chambers, gun weighs 6lbs 6ounces.

Parker DH 12 bore, 28" Damascus barrels, 1 frame, .086" and .090" minimum wall thickness at end of the 2-5/8" chambers, gun weighs 6lbs 14oz. Serial #84XXX, My Skeets gauges are incapable of measuring the diameters at the end of the chamber.

Bissel Birmingham boxlock, 20 gauge, 25" steel barrels, made in the 1920s, .084" and .092" minimum wall thickness at the chamber ends, 2-1/2" chambers.

My Skeets gauges are in capable of measuring the diameters at the end of the chamber."
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mike Shepherd For Your Post:
Unread 06-05-2013, 12:16 PM   #7
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,073
Thanks: 36,785
Thanked 34,222 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

Without appearing to condone the shooting of such thin-walled guns, I will say that I have an 1893 16 ga. 0-frame GH(e) with Damascus barrels that measure, at the front of the chamber where the forcing cones begin, .066" and .064" that I used to shoot for years as my "go to" grouse gun.

I have the letter from Oscar Gaddy when I sent him the barrels for his inspection where he states they are "probably okay to shoot using light loads of 7,500 p.s.i. or less." and he's the one who provided these measurements for me.

Again, I do NOT condone anyone else shooting any gun with such measurements.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 06-05-2013, 03:01 PM   #8
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

A few months ago I had a Remington/Parker VHE 28 gauge on approval. I returned it because the MWT of the chambers was in the range of 65 thousandths. I believe they left the factory that way and that thousand of rounds of modern 28 gauge shells had been fired in them.
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-05-2013, 04:44 PM   #9
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,073
Thanks: 36,785
Thanked 34,222 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

And you refused it??
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-05-2013, 08:04 PM   #10
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

Yes. I worried that if I kept it and then decided to sell it it would be hard to sell because of the chamber wall thicknesses. I might be wrong about the difficulty of selling it though.

Best,

Mike
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.