|
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
number |  |
09-19-2019, 09:46 PM
|
#3 | ||||||
|
number
17 is what shows when the image is turned slightly.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 09:48 PM
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Also if you scroll it up and down quickly it shows.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daniel Carter For Your Post: |
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 09:50 PM
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Sorry Greg if I ruined it for you but these things have always fascinated me and I should not have blurted out the answer.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 09:50 PM
|
#6 | ||||||
|
I'm a three-percenter!
   .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 09:54 PM
|
#7 | ||||||
|
When I was in the Air Force ('66 - '72) I could read the number on the tip of each prop blade (three blades per prop and each blade had a different number) of a Pratt & Whitney 4360 at idle.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 10:41 PM
|
#8 | ||||||
|
I saw it! WhudidI win???
__________________
"Doubtless the good Lord could have made a better game bird than bobwhite, and better country to hunt him in...but equally doubtless, he never did." -- Guy de la Valdene (from A Handful of Feathers ) "'I promise you,' he said, 'on my word of honor, I won't die on the opening of the bird season.'" -- Robert Ruark (from The Old Man and the Boy) |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Garry L Gordon For Your Post: |
|
|
|
09-20-2019, 06:40 AM
|
#9 | ||||||
|
When I first saw this little exercise I said to myself "I'm one of the 3%!" Then I posted this image here and low and behold virtually every respondent claims they can see a number, too! Albeit this is a very small sampling, there's just too many seeing a number to claim only 3% of all people can see a number.
Now this has got me wondering if the designer of this image, which first appeared in a scientific journal, is on to something . . . Could there be a number in there, besides the obvious, more cleverly disguised that only 3% can actually see?
__________________
Wild Skies Since 1951 |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2019, 07:05 AM
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Glasses off, it's plain as day. Glasses on, can't see it at all.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
