|
05-29-2017, 01:32 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
i once had a factory loaded remington 10 ga 3 1/2 incch shell that the brass and the plastic seperated...reason i found out another shell would not go into the barrel..the hull had stayed in the chamber i pulled it out with a knife...and i have had several 8 ga winchester brand hull that the bass wad was about 2/3 rds the way up the barrel..so i check my gun after every round i shoot in the 8 ga s....charlie
|
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post: |
05-29-2017, 02:45 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
I wish someone could logically and scientifically explain this alleged phenomenon to me.
It seems to defy Newtonian laws. When the round goes off, pressure should be equal in ALL directions. Including BACK against the base wad. The HS hull is a Reifenhauser type. And I've not heard of any Cheddites, Fiocchi or other such hulls doing this. Why not? And... If Winchester knew this was a potential hazard, WHY would their legal staff allow this "flawed" design to subject the company to such liability?? Just a few of the "cosmic questions" this issue always bring up... |
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post: |
05-29-2017, 04:07 PM | #5 | ||||||
|
I am sure the Newtonian laws are just fine. :-)
I would theorize that if the base wad becomes loose that upon firing, gases can get behind it. As the gases leave the barrel and pressure dissipates any gases trapped behind the base wad will likely escape a bit slower. And sometimes there might be just enough oomph of gas behind the wad to push it partially down the barrel as the pressure drops off. Just a thought. |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eric Estes For Your Post: |
05-29-2017, 04:39 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
There were a lot of postings on Trapshooter.com on this subject when the HS hulls first came out. Several guns blew up and this was the suspected cause. Nothing was ever proved or acknowledged. The rumors were that the cement was then changed. I have not heard of this happening in the last few years. So, perhaps the issues was fixed with the newer HS hulls. Billy
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Billy Gross For Your Post: |
05-29-2017, 07:10 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
If it did happen it must of sounded "off" and a safe shooter would have checked the bore before loading the next shell. I shoot some very old paper hulls with black powder in my Lifter. Some will separate at the brass/paper join , you can tell with the sound. Old hulls I always look every shot .
New or many times loaded AAs have never seen that happen but any unusual sound look before loading . William |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to William Davis For Your Post: |
03-22-2019, 08:19 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
Well I can tell you that I ringed the barrel of a Browning superposed with some of these three piece AA hulls that I had loaded. Both the upper barrel and the lower barrel. The gun didn't blow up but the barrels are ringed about 2/3s the way toward the muzzle. As to I should have heard it. I was shooting sporting clays and there were many shooters shooting around us. The noise around me would have made it hard to know that there was an issue with the previous shot. Shooting doubles the trigger finger is faster than the brain. These hulls were some of the first of this Winchester design. Never had an issue with the old one piece AA hulls. Maybe they are better now, I don't know. Mark
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Wallo For Your Post: |
|
|