Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
What are the differences between a Fox Sterlingworth and a Parker VH Grade
Unread 02-11-2013, 05:25 PM   #1
Member
BRDHNTR
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,870
Thanks: 7,717
Thanked 2,888 Times in 1,306 Posts

Default What are the differences between a Fox Sterlingworth and a Parker VH Grade

What are the differences (mechanically, wood, design features, finish, reliability and performance etc.) between the Fox Sterlingworth grade double and the Parker VH double as manufactured by each company?
allen newell is offline   Reply With Quote
Fox/Parker Differences
Unread 02-11-2013, 05:52 PM   #2
Member
Parkerman
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 268
Thanks: 394
Thanked 77 Times in 45 Posts

Default Fox/Parker Differences

I have both and based on a limited amount of shooting find them to be comparable (comparing Meridan Parker and Philadelphia Fox)

Linn
Linn Matthews is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-11-2013, 06:12 PM   #3
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,998 Times in 1,309 Posts

Default

In 1910 the Fox Gun Co. introduced “The Sterlingworth Company” boxlock with a Parker type hinge-pin. By 1911 the marking was changed to Sterlingworth and by 1913 the Parker hinge-pin recess was gone. The Sterlingworth was priced at $25 in 1915.
The Parker Gun Co. Trojan was introduced in 1912 at a price of $27.50.

1915 Iver Johnson Sporting Goods Catalogue (Successors to John. P. Lovell, Boston and not to be confused with Iver Johnson Arms)

Parker Trojan - $27.50
Fox Sterlingworth - $25.00
Ithaca Field - $19.00
Lefever Durston Special - $25.00

1917 Barker-Jennings Hardware Company, Lynchburg, Virginia

L.C. Smith Field - $32.50; AE - $42.50; Ideal - $42.50; AE - $54

By 1919 both the Parker Trojan and the Fox Sterlingworth were listed at $55. The L.C. Smith Field was $54.

In 1922 Fox dropped the price of the Sterlingworth to $48.

1929 Shapleigh Hardware Catalog

Field Grade L.C. Smith - $66.50.....AE - $85.50
Fox Sterlingworth - $60................AE - $79
Parker Trojan - $86
Parker V.H. - $108.......................AE - $143

Last edited by Drew Hause; 02-11-2013 at 06:31 PM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 02-11-2013, 06:15 PM   #4
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,021
Thanks: 4,219
Thanked 2,824 Times in 915 Posts

Default

Allen,

A more fair comparison would be between the Sterlingworth and the Trojan, the two lowest grade guns available at the time from Fox and Parker. The VH (and PH) is more favorably compared to the Fox A grade. The lowest grade guns were made to compete with each other and other low end doubles, and the flood of repeaters entering the market at the time.

The VH with its finely fitted and very attractive dog's head buttplate, finer and better executed checkering, slightly higher grade wood, more engraving, attractive forend latch and tip, etc. and higher price was reflective of the overall finer finish than the lower grade models.

Just my opinion.

Reliability and performance, I would not enter that debate.
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-11-2013, 06:15 PM   #5
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,779
Thanks: 503
Thanked 18,621 Times in 4,773 Posts

Default

The fit and finish is sort of on par. The VH would be a more finely finished gun in my opinion. The sterlingworth more compares to the Parker Trojan when it comes to level of finish. However the engraving on the fox and the VH are pretty much similar.

Mechanisms are completely different but equally as reliable and well built. The Parker mechanism is more complex for sure. The rotary bolting of the fox mechanism is superior in my opinion in that you nearly never find a loose fox. Or any other gun with the same type of bolting (LC smith, Ithaca NID). But, I do not think that the fox's bolting through the rib extension is as strong as the Parker under bite.

The sterlingworth was the lower priced gun in the day as compared to the VH and it still is today.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 02-11-2013, 06:23 PM   #6
Member
Brush Buster
PGCA Member
Second Badge
 
Russ Jackson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,242
Thanks: 3,321
Thanked 3,658 Times in 1,123 Posts

Default

I know this isn't what the poster of this Thread was looking for and all of the above answers seem correct ,but when you are walking behind that Pointer and feel that Recessed Hinge Pin under your fingers ,unless you are carrying an Early Fox Pin Gun , There is just No Comparison !
Russ Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-11-2013, 10:10 PM   #7
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 16,582
Thanked 6,918 Times in 2,641 Posts

Default

IMHO the Sterlingworth is a well built, very dependable gun for the money. Not very fancy but a Sterlingworth, like the Trojan, is still is a Fox inside as is the Trojan a Parker inside. The difference is all cosmetic.
Daryl Corona is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.