|
05-21-2015, 10:26 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
Are you referring to the toe of the stock being tucked under the barrels? My repro case, with one set of barrels, is the same way.
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired 'Earnest Will' 'Desert Shield' 'Desert Storm' 'Southern Watch' |
||||||
05-21-2015, 10:45 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
It has nothing to do with the gun, it's all about the case. Look at the lower left quadrant of the case, is your case laid out this way? I believe it's a one-of-a-kind case, in the Parker World, that's worth something.
__________________
Wild Skies Since 1951 |
||||||
05-22-2015, 06:57 AM | #5 | ||||||
|
Its all wrong!.....buy why??,, make it right )-: SXS ohio
|
||||||
05-22-2015, 09:59 AM | #6 | ||||||
|
That is odd - perhaps it is not the original case sized to the gun in which it cradles and was brilliantly "modified" to accept the frame of the gun?
..removing one of the primary functions of the case - that is genius |
||||||
05-26-2015, 02:45 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
Shouldn't the gizmo with the snap caps be in the big compartment against the water table so the gun can't move around?
|
||||||
05-26-2015, 06:02 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
Definitely different from mine. Given the choice, I would take mine over that case. The receiver seems as it it could flop up and down in that case. Definitely different though.
|
||||||
|
|