|
04-20-2018, 08:14 AM | #3 | ||||||
|
serial number seems a little low for a top lever -
any proof marks on the watertable ?
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE |
||||||
04-20-2018, 10:31 AM | #4 | ||||||
|
Yes. Need photos to figure out what you are talking about. Badly.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
04-20-2018, 01:46 PM | #5 | ||||||
|
Do you really mean “hammerless”?? That would be waaay before a hammerless serial number. And I am unaware of any sidelock Parker hammerless guns.
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row." |
||||||
04-20-2018, 02:42 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
There was one prototype. It is profiled in TPS. I wonder where that gun is today. But that was built in the late 1880s.
I can easily make a hammerless Parker. Take a hammer gun and remove the hammers.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
04-20-2018, 03:08 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
Yup Brian, there used to be a fella one a gun forum I used to frequent that would always correct if you described a gun as hammerless, to this nform that the gun was not hmmerless, it had internal hammers! What you propose would truly be hammerless, but useful only as a paperweight!!
If the pics show up as a true “internal hammer” Parker Bothers sidelock action, there is going to be a mad scramble bidding war!
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row." |
||||||
04-20-2018, 03:32 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
I remember seeing one that was converted at the Las Vegas show. I think I have it right that it was a hammer gun converted to hammerless.
|
||||||
04-20-2018, 06:14 PM | #9 | ||||||
|
There are a few of those out there too. Lefever did some. Converted to sidecocking as well.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
Hammerless sidelock |
04-23-2018, 01:44 AM | #10 | ||||||
|
Hammerless sidelock
Photos attached.
|
||||||
|
|