|
01-14-2015, 05:32 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
Even if good work much opening at all the gun is still going to end up with thin metal at the muzzles. Clear flag it's been altered.
William |
||||||
01-16-2015, 05:35 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
There is no one that knows so much about what they are doing in the "opening chokes" business that I would trust a medium high condition 12 gauge Trojan to their skills. This has worked for me in fifty years of shotgun gunsmithing experience. There are too many horror stories out there. I just don't do it.
|
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
01-16-2015, 08:59 PM | #5 | ||||||
|
bill if it worked for you for 50 years it should work for another 50 easy..good advice for sure....charlie
|
||||||
01-26-2015, 03:16 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
There are many smiths who can open chokes correctly - Brad Bachelder comes to mind. I open my own, but then I don't have to satisfy anyone but myself. And I am satisfied.
__________________
Paul Harm |
||||||
03-18-2015, 11:16 AM | #7 | ||||||
|
William, first one has to check barrel thickness at the muzzles before opening the chokes. I've found the American made doubles I've checked all have thick walls. English doubles are a different story. If you're going to open a gun with .035 constriction [ full choke ] to say .015 [ I/C ] you're removing .020, or .010 on a side. The guns I've done for myself all had at least .040 to .060 wall thickness, so removing .010 isn't going to hurt a thing. The Americans seem to like heavier guns, where as the English like light guns, meaning thinner barrels. But then we also like heavier loads of shot. I guess it's just our nature, bigger is better, too much is just right.
__________________
Paul Harm |
||||||
04-15-2015, 01:38 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
I have to side with Bill on this one from my experience. I can certainly tell you of a very well know smith who apparently CAN'T do it properly and left me with a set of non-concentric chokes with as little as .017" on one muzzle and a +.004" blunderbuss choke on the right barrel... this on a very very nice transition era 26" SG VH12. Makes me embarrassed and sick every time I look at it and degraded the gun's value dramatically.
|
||||||
04-15-2015, 04:27 PM | #9 | ||||||
|
Some years back I was asked to look at a Parker 16 ga that was missing many targets that seemed to be centered. The first thing we did was get out a patterning board, and found both barrels shooting laterally elongated patterns without much high or low. The muzzles bore that out, thin and oblong. The chokes had been opened by an unknown gunsmith to .006 or so, and there was not enough barrel wall thickness left at the muzzle to bore them again to round.
So the lesson is I suppose to be very careful, have enough wall thickness, ream them out gently, or better yet, leave them alone, use spreader loads, or just shoot for the head. A reloader can get a greater spread by not using a shot cup, just an over powder wad. Or an even greater spread by a true spreader post and wad combination. Keep in mind that the difference in a killing circle on a pattern board (30" at 40 yards) between full and cylinder is a 6" radius. So chokes give you inches in killing effectiveness whereas misses are usually much greater than that. Doing shotgun instruction, you look over the shoulder at the shot pattern by the clay and see misses by three feet or more. That is for an effective killing circle on game, generally six or more pellets on a game bird silhouette in the 30 inch circle. If you are shooting clays, one or two pellets is all it takes to break it. So, when you are considering chokes, keep in mind there is a difference between a clays effective choke and the tighter choke necessary for an effective and humane kill on a game bird. |
||||||
The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: | allen newell, Bill Murphy, Bob Hardison, Brett Souder, Dave Tatman, David Dwyer, Dean Romig, Eric Estes, Eric Grims, Gary Carmichael Sr, Gary Cripps, Harry Collins, Henry McRoberts, Jeff Christie, John Cinkoske, Karl Ferguson, Mark Garrett, Mills Morrison, Paul Ehlers, Richard Flanders, Robert Rambler, Steve Kleist, tom tutwiler |
04-15-2015, 06:22 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
Very well stated Bruce.
|
||||||
|
|